Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1743990›Full record

ReviewThe Histochemical journal1991

Assessment of lysosomal function by quantitative histochemical and cytochemical methods.

C J van Noorden

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Histochemical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C J van NoordenLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative histochemistry and cytochemistry enables a direct link to be made between metabolic functions such as the activity of lysosomal enzymes and the morphology of a tissue or a type of cell. Several approaches exist such as microchemistry based on (bio)chemical analysis of a single cell or a small piece of tissue dissected from a freeze-dried section. This technique has been routinely used for prenatal diagnosis of inherited enzyme defects and especially of lysosomal storage diseases. Other approaches are cytofluorometry or cytophotometry, which are based on the principle that a fluorescent or coloured final reaction product is precipitated at the site of the enzyme. The amount of final reaction product is analysed per cell or per unit volume of tissue using either a microscope cytofluorometer or flow cytometer for fluorescence measurements or an image analysing system or scanning and integrating cytophotometer for absorbance measurements. In principle, fluorescence methods are to be preferred over chromogenic methods because they are more sensitive and enable multiparameter analysis. However, only a limited number of fluorogenic methods are at hand that give a final reaction product which is sufficiently water-insoluble to guarantee good localisation. The best results have been obtained with methods based on naphthol AS-TR derivatives and with methods for the demonstration of protease activity using methoxynaphthylamine derivatives as substrates and 5'-nitrosalicylaldehyde as coupling reagent. Chromogenic methods are far better with respect to localisation properties and, therefore, most commonly used for quantitative histochemical analysis of lysosomal enzyme activities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

CytophotometryFlow CytometryHumansLysosomal Storage DiseasesLysosomes

Identifiers

PMID1743990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.