ReviewThe Histochemical journal1991
Assessment of lysosomal function by quantitative histochemical and cytochemical methods.
Review in The Histochemical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The morphofunctional pattern of neuronal biogenic amines in postpartum involution period-an in vivo study.Histology and histopathology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative histochemistry and cytochemistry enables a direct link to be made between metabolic functions such as the activity of lysosomal enzymes and the morphology of a tissue or a type of cell. Several approaches exist such as microchemistry based on (bio)chemical analysis of a single cell or a small piece of tissue dissected from a freeze-dried section. This technique has been routinely used for prenatal diagnosis of inherited enzyme defects and especially of lysosomal storage diseases. Other approaches are cytofluorometry or cytophotometry, which are based on the principle that a fluorescent or coloured final reaction product is precipitated at the site of the enzyme. The amount of final reaction product is analysed per cell or per unit volume of tissue using either a microscope cytofluorometer or flow cytometer for fluorescence measurements or an image analysing system or scanning and integrating cytophotometer for absorbance measurements. In principle, fluorescence methods are to be preferred over chromogenic methods because they are more sensitive and enable multiparameter analysis. However, only a limited number of fluorogenic methods are at hand that give a final reaction product which is sufficiently water-insoluble to guarantee good localisation. The best results have been obtained with methods based on naphthol AS-TR derivatives and with methods for the demonstration of protease activity using methoxynaphthylamine derivatives as substrates and 5'-nitrosalicylaldehyde as coupling reagent. Chromogenic methods are far better with respect to localisation properties and, therefore, most commonly used for quantitative histochemical analysis of lysosomal enzyme activities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
1743990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.