ArticleBMC structural biology2007
Prediction of flexible/rigid regions from protein sequences using k-spaced amino acid pairs.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- GDA-Pred: Generative AI-Driven Data Augmentation for Improved Prediction of IL-6 and IL-13-Inducing Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Prediction and analysis of anti-aging peptides using data augmentation and machine learning algorithms.BMC biology · 2025Article
- HEPAD: enhancing hemolytic peptide prediction with adaptive feature engineering and diverse sequence descriptors.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A stacked ensemble classifier for the discovery of prokaryotic efflux proteins based on sequence information.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- A genetic algorithm-based ensemble model for efficiently identifying interleukin 6 inducing peptides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- iDNS3IP: Identification and Characterization of HCV NS3 Protease Inhibitory Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Graph-RPI: predicting RNA-protein interactions via graph autoencoder and self-supervised learning strategies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- ShortStop: a machine learning framework for microprotein discovery.BMC methods · 2025Article
- iACVP-MR: Accurate Identification of Anti-coronavirus Peptide based on Multiple Features Information and Recurrent Neural Network.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- PLMC: Language Model of Protein Sequences Enhances Protein Crystallization Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- PredPSP: a novel computational tool to discover pathway-specific photosynthetic proteins in plants.Plant molecular biology · 2024Article
- ProSol-multi: Protein solubility prediction via amino acids multi-level correlation and discriminative distribution.Heliyon · 2024Article
- PMTPred: machine-learning-based prediction of protein methyltransferases using the composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs.Molecular diversity · 2024Article
- Improved prediction of anti-angiogenic peptides based on machine learning models and comprehensive features from peptide sequences.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- PredIL13: Stacking a variety of machine and deep learning methods with ESM-2 language model for identifying IL13-inducing peptides.PloS one · 2024Article
- ENCAP: Computational prediction of tumor T cell antigens with ensemble classifiers and diverse sequence features.PloS one · 2024Article
- ResNetKhib: a novel cell type-specific tool for predicting lysine 2-hydroxyisobutylation sites via transfer learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Omics Data and Data Representations for Deep Learning-Based Predictive Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- SNARER: new molecular descriptors for SNARE proteins classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level.BioMed research international · 2022Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally, it is believed that the native structure of a protein corresponds to a global minimum of its free energy. However, with the growing number of known tertiary (3D) protein structures, researchers have discovered that some proteins can alter their structures in response to a change in their surroundings or with the help of other proteins or ligands. Such structural shifts play a crucial role with respect to the protein function. To this end, we propose a machine learning method for the prediction of the flexible/rigid regions of proteins (referred to as FlexRP); the method is based on a novel sequence representation and feature selection. Knowledge of the flexible/rigid regions may provide insights into the protein folding process and the 3D structure prediction.
resultsThe flexible/rigid regions were defined based on a dataset, which includes protein sequences that have multiple experimental structures, and which was previously used to study the structural conservation of proteins. Sequences drawn from this dataset were represented based on feature sets that were proposed in prior research, such as PSI-BLAST profiles, composition vector and binary sequence encoding, and a newly proposed representation based on frequencies of k-spaced amino acid pairs. These representations were processed by feature selection to reduce the dimensionality. Several machine learning methods for the prediction of flexible/rigid regions and two recently proposed methods for the prediction of conformational changes and unstructured regions were compared with the proposed method. The FlexRP method, which applies Logistic Regression and collocation-based representation with 95 features, obtained 79.5% accuracy. The two runner-up methods, which apply the same sequence representation and Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Naïve Bayes classifiers, obtained 79.2% and 78.4% accuracy, respectively. The remaining considered methods are characterized by accuracies below 70%. Finally, the Naïve Bayes method is shown to provide the highest sensitivity for the prediction of flexible regions, while FlexRP and SVM give the highest sensitivity for rigid regions.
conclusionA new sequence representation that uses k-spaced amino acid pairs is shown to be the most efficient in the prediction of the flexible/rigid regions of protein sequences. The proposed FlexRP method provides the highest prediction accuracy of about 80%. The experimental tests show that the FlexRP and SVM methods achieved high overall accuracy and the highest sensitivity for rigid regions, while the best quality of the predictions for flexible regions is achieved by the Naïve Bayes method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.