Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17437333›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2007

Concentration gradient immunoassay. 2. Computational modeling for analysis and optimization.

Jennifer O Foley, Kjell E Nelson, Afshin Mashadi-Hossein, Bruce A Finlayson, Paul Yager

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of novel anti-Kv 11.1 antibody-conjugated PEG-TiOJournal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer O FoleyDepartment of Bioengineering, and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Kjell E Nelson
Afshin Mashadi-Hossein
Bruce A Finlayson
Paul Yager
University of Washington · US

Funding

Rapid parallel salivary immunoassays on a disposableU01DE014971 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YAGER, PAUL · 2002 to 2005
$3.8M
Training in Engineered BiomaterialsT32GM065098 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RATNER, BUDDY D · 2003 to 2007
$930k
NIDCR NIH HHS 1U01 DE14971-01NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE014971NIGMS NIH HHS 1 T32 GM065098-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel microfluidic surface-based competition immunoassay, termed the concentration gradient immunoassay (described in detail in a companion paper (Nelson, K.; Foley, J.; Yager, P. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 3542-3548.) uses surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging to rapidly measure the concentration of small molecules. To conduct this assay, antibody and analyte are introduced into the two inlets of a T-sensor (Weigl, B. H.; Yager, P. Science 1999, 283, 346-347. Kamholz, A. E.; Weigl, B. H.; Finlayson, B. A.; Yager, P. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 5340-5347). Several millimeters downstream, antibody molecules with open binding sites can bind to a surface functionalized with immobilized antigen. This space- and time-dependent binding can be sensitively observed using SPR imaging. In this paper, we describe a complex three-dimensional finite element model developed to better understand the dynamic processes occurring with this assay. The model shows strong qualitative agreement with experimental results for small-molecule detection. The model confirms the experimental finding that the position within the microchannel at which the antibody binds to the immobilized analyte may be used to quantify the concentration of analyte in the sample. In addition, the model was used to explore the sensitivity of assay performance to parameters such as antibody and analyte concentrations, thereby giving insight into ways to optimize analysis speed and accuracy. Given the experimental verification of the computational results, this model serves as an efficient method to explore the influence of the flow rate, microchannel dimensions, and antibody concentration on the sensitivity of the assay.

Indexed as

AntibodiesFinite Element AnalysisSurface Plasmon ResonanceAntigen-Antibody ReactionsBiosensing TechniquesImmunoassayOrganic ChemicalsAntibodiesOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID17437333
PMCPMC2546490
OpenAlexW2073877478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.