ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2007
Forensic efficiency of microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twenty Years Later: A Comprehensive Review of the X Chromosome Use in Forensic Genetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Brazilian genetic database of chromosome X.Molecular biology reports · 2014Article
- Sixteen X-chromosomal STRs in two octaplex PCRs in Japanese population and development of 15-locus multiplex PCR system.International journal of legal medicine · 2010Article
- Reduced-volume and low-volume typing of Y-chromosomal SNPs to obtain Finnish Y-chromosomal compound haplotypes.International journal of legal medicine · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymorphisms located on the X chromosome are being increasingly used in forensic studies. However, they have not been studied as extensively as the autosomal and Y-linked polymorphisms. Therefore, we planned to study the population genetics of two sets of X-linked markers, including short-tandem repeats (STRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and particularly analyze the differences at the microgeographical level. Six X-linked STRs (DXS 9895, DXS 7132, DXS 9898, DXS 6789, GATA 172D05, and DXS 7130) and ten SNPs (rs1229078, rs1544545, rs4442270, rs1874111, rs5968332, rs1166756, rs12849634, rs5932595, rs203648, and rs611711) were studied in two population samples from Cantabria, northern Spain, a mixed coastal population and a relatively isolated small population in the Pas valley. There were statistically significant differences in allelic frequencies of the six STRs studied between both populations. On the other hand, only one out of ten SNPs studied showed between-population differences. Overall Fst values were 0.4-2.9% and 1.8-2.2% for the STRs and the SNPs, respectively. The overall power of discrimination for female samples was higher than 99.99% for both groups of markers. Therefore, these sets of X-linked STRs and SNPs seem to be potentially useful in forensic genetics, but care should be taken when interpreting results from cases that originate from small and relatively isolated populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.