Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17435764›Full record

ArticleNature methods2007

A model system for analyzing somatic mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Ana Maria Garcia, Anastasia Derventzi, Rita Busuttil, R Brent Calder, Ernesto Perez, Linda Chadwell, Martijn E T Dollé, Martha Lundell, Jan Vijg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aging genomes: a necessary evil in the logic of life.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of the mutation rate.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Maria GarciaUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.
Anastasia Derventzi
Rita Busuttil
R Brent Calder
Ernesto Perez
Linda Chadwell
Martijn E T Dollé
Martha Lundell
Jan Vijg
Buck Institute for Research on Aging · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

Mutation accumulation in mice of extended life spanR01AG020438 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI VIJG, JAN · 2001 to 2009
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS AG20438NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presently there are no good assays for comparing somatic mutation frequencies and spectra between different vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Here we describe a new lacZ mutation reporter system in D. melanogaster, which complements existing systems in the mouse. The results obtained with the new model indicate two-to threefold higher frequencies of spontaneous mutations than in the mouse, with most of the mutations characterized as large genome rearrangements.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterFemaleLac OperonMaleModels, GeneticSite-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)DNA modification methylase HindIIISite-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)

Identifiers

PMID17435764
PMCPMC2723853
OpenAlexW1972720762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.