Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17435551›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2007

Preoperative assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma tumor grade using needle biopsy: implications for transplant eligibility.

Timothy M Pawlik, Ana L Gleisner, Robert A Anders, Lia Assumpcao, Warren Maley, Michael A Choti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patient Selection for Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation-Adjusting the Odds?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 22187-6681, USA. tpawlik1@jhmi.edu
Ana L Gleisner
Robert A Anders
Lia Assumpcao
Warren Maley
Michael A Choti
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the diagnostic agreement of preoperative needle core biopsy (NCB) grading of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with the final surgical pathologic tumor grade. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Some centers have adopted protocols for selecting patients with HCC for transplantation based on tumor grade as determined by preoperative NCB. The validity of NCB to predict final tumor grade has not been previously assessed.

methodsA total of 211 patients who underwent hepatic resection, open radiofrequency, or transplantation for HCC between 1998 and 2004 were identified. Clinicopathologic, NCB, and surgical data were collected and analyzed using chi and kappa statistics.

resultsA total of 120 (67.4%) of the 178 who underwent resection or transplantation had an NCB. On preoperative NCB, the majority of HCC cases were classified as well-differentiated (n = 35; 37.6%) or moderately differentiated (n = 44; 47.3%), while 14 (15.1%) cases were categorized as poorly differentiated. In contrast, when tumor grading was based on the final surgical specimen, there was a significantly higher proportion of HCC cases graded as poorly differentiated (well-differentiated, n = 34; 36.6%; moderately differentiated, n = 33; 35.5%; poorly differentiated, n = 26; 27.9%) (P < 0.05). The overall percent agreement of NCB and surgical pathology to determine tumor grade was poor (kappa = 0.18, P < 0.0001). Whereas final pathologic tumor grade predicted the presence of microscopic vascular invasion (well, 15.7%; moderate; 31.9%, poor; 58.4%; P = 0.001), NCB grade did not (well, 23.7%; moderate, 28.0%; poor, 25.4%; P = 0.65).

conclusionsSelection of candidates for transplantation based on NCB tumor grade may be misleading, as NCB tumor grade often did not correlate with grade or presence of microscopic vascular invasion on final pathology. Clinicomorphologic criteria (tumor size, number) should remain the major determinants of eligibility for transplantation.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationBiopsy, NeedleCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis CHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPatient SelectionPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID17435551
PMCPMC1877015
OpenAlexW1977536765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.