ArticleGenetics2007
Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule.
Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
159 citing papers in PubMed.
- A standardised framework for classifying estimates of reproductive isolation.Evolution letters · 2026Article
- Alternative reproductive strategies explain asymmetries in reproductive isolation and reinforcement in two Ischnura damselfly species.Heredity · 2026Article
- How population subsampling to concentrate selection effects can help to find epistatic interactions of transmission ratio distortion.Heredity · 2026Article
- Article
- The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation revisited.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Unidirectional Mitochondrial Introgression Despite Limited Nuclear Admixture in North American Red-Backed Voles,Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Aberrant X chromosome dosage compensation causes hybrid male inviability inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Phylogenomic timetree-calibrated speciation clocks for Caenorhabditis nematodes reveal slow but disproportionate accumulation of post-zygotic reproductive isolation.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Five new Caenorhabditis species from Indonesia provide exceptions to Haldane's rule and partial fertility of interspecific hybrids.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Genetic Basis of Reproductive Isolation in Torrey Pine (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Embryonic Lethality, Juvenile Growth Variation, and Adult Sterility Correlate With Phylogenetic Distance of Danionin Hybrids.Evolution & development · 2025Article
- Quantitative nectar spur length governs nonrandom mating in a bee-pollinatedPlant diversity · 2025Article
- Genomes of Microtus Rodents Highlight the Importance of Olfactory and Immune Systems in Their Fast Radiation.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Creation of true interspecies hybrids: Rescue of hybrid class with hybrid cytoplasm affecting growth and metabolism.Science advances · 2024Article
- Beyond Haldane's rule: Sex-biased hybrid dysfunction for all modes of sex determination.eLife · 2024Review
- Recent secondary contact, genome-wide admixture, and asymmetric introgression of neo-sex chromosomes between two Pacific island bird species.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Hybridization between Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis mosquitoes leads to disruption of male sex determination.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Fisher's Geometric Model as a Tool to Study Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- A pollen selection system links self and interspecific incompatibility in the Brassicaceae.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- Genome Evolution and Introgression in the New Zealand mud Snails Potamopyrgus estuarinus and Potamopyrgus kaitunuparaoa.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymmetric postmating isolation, where reciprocal interspecific crosses produce different levels of fertilization success or hybrid sterility/inviability, is very common. Darwin emphasized its pervasiveness in plants, but it occurs in all taxa assayed. This asymmetry often results from Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities (DMIs) involving uniparentally inherited genetic factors (e.g., gametophyte-sporophyte interactions in plants or cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions). Typically, unidirectional (U) DMIs act simultaneously with bidirectional (B) DMIs between autosomal loci that affect reciprocal crosses equally. We model both classes of two-locus DMIs to make quantitative and qualitative predictions concerning patterns of isolation asymmetry in parental species crosses and in the hybrid F(1) generation. First, we find conditions that produce expected differences. Second, we present a stochastic analysis of DMI accumulation to predict probable levels of asymmetry as divergence time increases. We find that systematic interspecific differences in relative rates of evolution for autosomal vs. nonautosomal loci can lead to different expected F(1) fitnesses from reciprocal crosses, but asymmetries are more simply explained by stochastic differences in the accumulation of U DMIs. The magnitude of asymmetry depends primarily on the cumulative effects of U vs. B DMIs (which depend on heterozygous effects of DMIs), the average number of DMIs required to produce complete reproductive isolation (more asymmetry occurs when fewer DMIs are required), and the shape of the function describing how fitness declines as DMIs accumulate. Comparing our predictions to data from diverse taxa indicates that unidirectional DMIs, specifically involving sex chromosomes, cytoplasmic elements, and maternal effects, are likely to play an important role in postmating isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.