Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17433843›Full record

ReviewTrends in biotechnology2007

Protein aggregation in silico.

Troy Cellmer, Dusan Bratko, John M Prausnitz, Harvey W Blanch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biotechnology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  10. Probing protein aggregation using discrete molecular dynamics.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Troy CellmerNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Dusan Bratko
John M Prausnitz
Harvey W Blanch

Funding

Experimental/Computational Study of Protein AggregationR01GM070919 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEAD-GORDON, TERESA L. · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein aggregation is a challenge to the successful manufacture of protein therapeutics; it can impose severe limitations on purification yields and compromise formulation stability. Advances in computer power, and the wealth of computational studies pertaining to protein folding, have facilitated the development of molecular simulation as a tool to investigate protein misfolding and aggregation. Here, we highlight the successes of protein aggregation studies carried out in silico, with a particular emphasis on studies related to biotechnology. To conclude, we discuss future prospects for the field, and identify several biotechnology-related problems that would benefit from molecular simulation.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, MolecularBinding SitesComputer SimulationCrystallizationMultiprotein ComplexesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsTemperatureMultiprotein ComplexesProteins

Identifiers

PMID17433843
PMCPMC2680282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.