ReviewHNO2007
[Coblation tonsillectomy: a review of the literature].
Review in HNO, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Possibilities of coblation in otorhinolaryngology: analytical review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Review
- Recent medical devices for tonsillectomy.Hippokratia · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundControversy surrounds the question of which technique should be preferred for tonsillectomy in order to reduce postoperative morbidity in terms of pain, bleeding, activity and return to normal diet. This study reviews the current literature on coblation tonsillectomy (CTE). MATERIALS AND
methodsAll studies published in peer-reviewed journals reporting postoperative morbidity following CTE until July 2006 were included in our study.
resultsA total of 21 studies matched our search criteria but there were excluded from further analysis because coblation was used only for volume reduction of the tonsils. Reduced morbidity was registered in eight studies, two could not identify any difference and five studies reported an increased postoperative morbidity. Seven different surgical procedures were compared in 17 studies to CTE. The patients were not followed-up in four studies and the follow-up exceeded 1 week in nine studies only. Wound inspection was performed in four studies and a better wound healing reported in two of these, but by the same authors. Postoperative bleeding requiring surgical treatment under general anaesthesia occurred with an incidence of 0% to 11.5%. Secondary bleeding (>24 h) prevailed in all but two studies. Postoperative pain was evaluated in ten studies with conflicting results.
conclusionsThe design of the current studies varies in size, age distribution, indications for surgery, the surgical techniques compared and follow-up. The results are heterogenous and further evidence is still required to show that CTE is a safe alternative. Therefore, calculation of cost-effectiveness of a commonly performed expensive CTE as a new standard technique is currently impossible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.