Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17431564›Full record

ReviewHNO2007

[Functional anatomy of the larynx from clinical points of view: part II: Laryngeal mucous membrane, blood supply, innervation, lymphatic drainage, age-related changes].

H Kutta, S Knipping, H Claassen, F Paulsen

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A retrospective evaluation of the etiology of unilateral vocal fold paralysis over the last 25 years.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H KuttaKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätskrankenhaus Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
S Knipping
H Claassen
F Paulsen
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diseases of the larynx are of concern not only for ear, nose, and throat physicians and phoniatricians but also for other clinicians who treat the larynx either conservatively or surgically, including speech therapists, pediatricians, anesthetists, oncologists, pulmonologists, radiologists, and general practitioners. Based on today's state of knowledge and taking into account our own research results of the last years as well as clinical points of view, the present contribution gives a short overview of the anatomy and physiology of the larynx. Part 2 discusses the functional anatomy of the laryngeal mucous membrane (glycoconjugates, mucins, trefoil factor family peptides, antimicrobial substances, larynx-associated lymphoid tissue), the vascular supply, innervation, and lymphatic drainage, as well as age-related laryngeal changes and their effects on swallowing, breathing, and phonation.

Indexed as

AgingHumansLaryngeal NervesLarynxLymphatic System

Identifiers

PMID17431564
OpenAlexW3172933056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.