Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17431501›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2007

Lead exposure and cardiovascular disease--a systematic review.

Ana Navas-Acien, Eliseo Guallar, Ellen K Silbergeld, Stephen J Rothenberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 417 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
417citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

417 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Environmental toxic metal contaminants and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Lead exposure and its association with neurological damage: systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

357 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Navas-AcienDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Eliseo Guallar
Ellen K Silbergeld
Stephen J Rothenberg

Funding

PILOT STUDY--ACID FOG, AN EXPERIMENTAL MODELP30ES003819 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROOPMAN, JOHN D · 1985 to 2012
$22.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES 03819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review evaluates the evidence on the association between lead exposure and cardiovascular end points in human populations.

methodsWe reviewed all observational studies from database searches and citations regarding lead and cardiovascular end points.

resultsA positive association of lead exposure with blood pressure has been identified in numerous studies in different settings, including prospective studies and in relatively homogeneous socioeconomic status groups. Several studies have identified a dose-response relationship. Although the magnitude of this association is modest, it may be underestimated by measurement error. The hypertensive effects of lead have been confirmed in experimental models. Beyond hypertension, studies in general populations have identified a positive association of lead exposure with clinical cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular, coronary heart disease, and stroke mortality; and peripheral arterial disease), but the number of studies is small. In some studies these associations were observed at blood lead levels < 5 microg/dL.

conclusionsWe conclude that the evidence is sufficient to infer a causal relationship of lead exposure with hypertension. We conclude that the evidence is suggestive but not sufficient to infer a causal relationship of lead exposure with clinical cardiovascular outcomes. There is also suggestive but insufficient evidence to infer a causal relationship of lead exposure with heart rate variability. PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: These findings have immediate public health implications. Current occupational safety standards for blood lead must be lowered and a criterion for screening elevated lead exposure needs to be established in adults. Risk assessment and economic analyses of lead exposure impact must include the cardiovascular effects of lead. Finally, regulatory and public health interventions must be developed and implemented to further prevent and reduce lead exposure.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHumansLeadEnvironmental PollutantsLead

Identifiers

PMID17431501
PMCPMC1849948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.