Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17430691›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2007

Rationale for, and approach to, studying modifiers of risk in persons with a genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer.

Mark A Jenkins, Melissa C Southey, Graham G Giles, John L Hopper

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X in Central Iran: A New Clinicopathologic Description.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2017
    Article
  2. Familial colorectal cancer type X: genetic profiles and phenotypic features.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark A JenkinsCentre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Melissa C Southey
Graham G Giles
John L Hopper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We address the issue of modifiers of risk for persons who are, on average, at high risk of colorectal cancer due to carrying germline genetic mutations. We discuss how to estimate risk and assess modifiers using data from mutation-carrying families. A critical analytical issue is the adjustment for how families have been sampled (ascertainment). Only a few published studies have made appropriate adjustments and have mostly reported lifetime risks of less than 50%. Incomplete penetrance and differences in risk by subcategories are consistent with the existence of genetic and/or environmental risk -modifiers. Data from large cohorts of carriers are required to study such modifiers with precision.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairHumansMutationPenetranceRisk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.