Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17430579›Full record

ArticleBMC biochemistry2007

Mapping of possible prion protein self-interaction domains using peptide arrays.

Alan Rigter, Jan P M Langeveld, Drophatie Timmers-Parohi, Jorg G Jacobs, Peter L J M Moonen, Alex Bossers

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biochemistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification and application of self-binding zipper-like sequences in SARS-CoV spike protein.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan RigterCentral Institute for Animal Disease Control (CIDC-Lelystad), Wageningen UR Dept, of Bacteriology and TSEs, AA Lelystad, The Netherlands. alan.rigter@wur.nl <alan.rigter@wur.nl>
Jan P M Langeveld
Drophatie Timmers-Parohi
Jorg G Jacobs
Peter L J M Moonen
Alex Bossers
Wageningen University & Research · NLPepscan (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe common event in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) or prion diseases is the conversion of host-encoded protease sensitive cellular prion protein (PrPC) into strain dependent isoforms of scrapie associated protease resistant isoform (PrPSc) of prion protein (PrP). These processes are determined by similarities as well as strain dependent variations in the PrP structure. Selective self-interaction between PrP molecules is the most probable basis for initiation of these processes, potentially influenced by chaperone molecules, however the mechanisms behind these processes are far from understood. We previously determined that polymorphisms do not affect initial PrPC to PrPSc binding but rather modulate a subsequent step in the conversion process. Determining possible sites of self-interaction could elucidate which amino acid(s) or amino acid sequences contribute to binding and further conversion into other isoforms. To this end, ovine - and bovine PrP peptide-arrays consisting of 15-mer overlapping peptides were probed with recombinant sheep PrPC fused to maltose binding protein (MBP-PrP).

resultsThe peptide-arrays revealed two distinct high binding areas as well as some regions of lower affinity in PrPC resulting in total in 7 distinct amino acid sequences (AAs). The first high binding area comprises sheep-PrP peptides 43-102 (AA 43-116), including the N-terminal octarepeats. The second high binding area of sheep-PrP peptides 134-177 (AA 134-191), encompasses most of the scrapie susceptibility-associated polymorphisms in sheep. This concurs with previous studies showing that scrapie associated-polymorphisms do not modulate the initial binding of PrPC to PrPSc. Comparison of ovine - and bovine peptide-array binding patterns revealed that amino acid specific differences can influence the MBP-PrP binding pattern. PrP-specific antibodies were capable to completely block interaction between the peptide-array and MBP-PrP. MBP-PrP was also capable to specifically bind to PrP in a Western blot approach. The octarepeat region of PrP seems primarily important for this interaction because proteinase K pre-treatment of PrPSc completely abolished binding.

conclusionBinding of MBP-PrP to PrP-specific sequences indicate that several specific self-interactions between individual PrP molecules can occur and suggest that an array of interactions between PrPC-PrPC as well as PrPC-PrPSc may be possible, which ultimately lead to variations in species barrier and strain differences.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarrier ProteinsCattleMaltose-Binding ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticProtein Array AnalysisProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProtein Structure, TertiaryPrPC ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSheepCarrier ProteinsMaltose-Binding ProteinsPrPC ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17430579
PMCPMC1855927
OpenAlexW2082541322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.