Trial reportPediatric transplantation2007
Safety and efficacy of prolonged cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with intravenous ganciclovir in pediatric and young adult lung transplant recipients.
Trial report in Pediatric transplantation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pilot Study of Model-Based Dosage Individualization of Ganciclovir in Neonates and Young Infants with Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Trial
- Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CMV infection causes morbidity and mortality after transplantation. Despite a wide range of prevention strategies among pediatric lung transplant programs, the optimal duration of prophylactic therapy against CMV infection in pediatric lung transplantation is unknown. To assess the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of extending intravenous ganciclovir administration from six wk duration to 12 wk duration in pediatric lung transplant recipients. An open-label pilot study was performed in primary pediatric lung transplant recipients with donor and/or recipient CMV seropositivity. Intravenous ganciclovir was given for 12 wk post-transplantation. Subjects were tracked for protocol completion. Toxicities monitored included renal dysfunction, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal and neurological complications, as well as infection related to indwelling catheter placement. Serial CMV levels were measured to determine short-term efficacy of the intervention. Nine of nine subjects enrolled completed the pilot study. Subjects' ages ranged from six to 18 yr. Indications for lung transplantation included cystic fibrosis (n = 7), idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (n = 1), and complex congenital heart disease with pulmonary hypertension (n = 1). Seven subjects underwent deceased donor bilateral lung transplantation and two subjects underwent heart-lung transplantation. No subjects had protocol-defined drug toxicity. No episodes of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal toxicity occurred. Five subjects had catheter-related infections (three after week 12 of ganciclovir). Seven of nine subjects had CMV detected by PCR (four prior to ganciclovir completion) with only one subject having a positive viral culture for CMV viremia (prior to ganciclovir completion). No subjects had UL-97 mutation for ganciclovir resistance detected. The use of prolonged prophylactic administration of ganciclovir for 12 wk duration is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment to prevent CMV viremia based on viral culture in at risk pediatric lung transplant recipients. Further clinical studies are underway to determine optimal CMV prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.