Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17428932›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Multicenter evaluation of a new disk agar diffusion method for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin.

A Espinel-Ingroff, B Arthington-Skaggs, N Iqbal, D Ellis, M A Pfaller, S Messer, M Rinaldi, A Fothergill, D L Gibbs, A Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of ERG11 and MDR1 genes in cycloheximide and multidrug resistance in Candida species.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tapping the biosynthetic potential of marineFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Practical Guide to Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

A Espinel-IngroffVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23298-0049, USA. avingrof@vcu.edu
B Arthington-Skaggs
N Iqbal
D Ellis
M A Pfaller
S Messer
M Rinaldi
A Fothergill
D L Gibbs
A Wang
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USUniversity of Iowa · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · USWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to correlate inhibition zone diameters, in millimeters (agar diffusion disk method), with the broth dilution MICs or minimum effective concentrations (MECs) (CLSI M38-A method) of five antifungal agents to identify optimal testing guidelines for disk mold testing. The following disk diffusion testing parameters were evaluated for 555 isolates of the molds Absidia corymbifera, Aspergillus sp. (five species), Alternaria sp., Bipolaris spicifera, Fusarium sp. (three species), Mucor sp. (two species), Paecilomyces lilacinus, Rhizopus sp. (two species), and Scedosporium sp. (two species): (i) two media (supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar [2% dextrose and 0.5 microg/ml methylene blue] and plain Mueller-Hinton [MH] agar), (ii) three incubation times (16 to 24, 48, and 72 h), and (iii) seven disks (amphotericin B and itraconazole 10-microg disks, voriconazole 1- and 10-microg disks, two sources of caspofungin 5-microg disks [BBL and Oxoid], and posaconazole 5-microg disks). MH agar supported better growth of all of the species tested (24 to 48 h). The reproducibility of zone diameters and their correlation with either MICs or MECs (caspofungin) were superior on MH agar (91 to 100% versus 82 to 100%; R, 0.71 to 0.93 versus 0.53 to 0.96 for four of the five agents). Based on these results, the optimal testing conditions for mold disk diffusion testing were (i) plain MH agar; (ii) incubation times of 16 to 24 h (zygomycetes), 24 h (Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. niger), and 48 h (other species); and (iii) the posaconazole 5-microg disk, voriconazole 1-microg disk, itraconazole 10-microg disk (for all except zygomycetes), BBL caspofungin 5-microg disk, and amphotericin B 10-microg (zygomycetes only).

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginCulture MediaDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsEchinocandinsFungiItraconazoleLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPeptides, CyclicPyrimidinesReproducibility of ResultsTriazolesVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginCulture MediaEchinocandinsItraconazoleLipopeptidesPeptides, CyclicposaconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID17428932
PMCPMC1933077
OpenAlexW2133798991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.