Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17428601›Full record

ReviewBiochimie2007

The N-formyl peptide receptors and the anaphylatoxin C5a receptors: an overview.

Marie-Josèphe Rabiet, Emilie Huet, François Boulay

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cross-Platform Biosensing of Immune Receptors Using Peptide-Functionalized Graphene.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Membrane potential dynamics of C5a-stimulated neutrophil granulocytes.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. AaTs-1: A Tetrapeptide fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of venoms on neutrophil respiratory burst: a major inflammatory function.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Review
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. AFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mitochondria in innate immune signaling.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Decoding the chemotactic signal.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-Josèphe RabietLaboratoire de Biochimie et de Biophysique des Systèmes Intégrés, CEA, CNRS, Université Joseph Fourier, Institut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant (iRTSV), Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique Grenoble, 38054 Grenoble cedex 9, France.
Emilie Huet
François Boulay
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leukocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation and infection is dependent on the presence of a gradient of locally produced chemotactic factors. This review is focused on current knowledge about the activation and regulation of chemoattractant receptors. Emphasis is placed on the members of the N-formyl peptide receptor family, namely FPR (N-formyl peptide receptor), FPRL1 (FPR like-1) and FPRL2 (FPR like-2), and the complement fragment C5a receptors (C5aR and C5L2). Upon chemoattractant binding, the receptors transduce an activation signal through a G protein-dependent pathway, leading to biochemical responses that contribute to physiological defense against bacterial infection and tissue damage. C5aR, and the members of the FPR family that were previously thought to be restricted to phagocytes proved to have a much broader spectrum of cell expression. In addition to N-formylated peptides, numerous unrelated ligands were recently found to interact with FPR and FPRL1. Novel agonists include both pathogen- and host-derived components, and synthetic peptides. Antagonistic molecules have been identified that exhibit limited receptor specificity. How distinct ligands can both induce different biological responses and produce different modes of receptor activation and unique sets of cellular responses are discussed. Cell responses to chemoattractants are tightly regulated at the level of the receptors. This review describes in detail the regulation of receptor signalling and the multi-step process of receptor inactivation. New concepts, such as receptor oligomerization and receptor clustering, are considered. Although FPR, FPRL1 and C5aR trigger similar biological functions and undergo a rapid chemoattractant-mediated phosphorylation, they appear to be differentially regulated and experience different intracellular fates.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataPhosphorylationReceptor, Anaphylatoxin C5aReceptors, Formyl PeptideSequence Homology, Amino AcidSignal TransductionReceptor, Anaphylatoxin C5aReceptors, Formyl Peptide

Identifiers

PMID17428601
PMCPMC7115771
OpenAlexW2045322776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.