ArticleAtencion primaria2007
[Management systems for the renewal of medical prescriptions: the vision of users and health professionals].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Organizational procedures and health care management. A point of view from primary care centres].Atencion primaria · 2011Article
- [Repeat prescription management systems: strategy for optimising their use].Atencion primaria · 2009Article
- [Study of a health centre drug prescribing in chronic patients].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo find the degree of satisfaction of users and doctors who use the repeat medical prescription system.
designMulti-centre, cross-sectional study.
settingFour primary care centres covering 160 000 inhabitants.
participantsUsers included in the repeat medical prescription system and doctors who use it. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaire on satisfaction. MAIN
resultsUsers (52.4% women) filled in 429 questionnaires (mean age, 64.2; SD, 13.98). Average medicines taken were 4.4 (SD, 3.04). The period established for picking up prescriptions was usually 60 days (77.4%). 83.9% (95% CI, 80.4-87.4) of those questioned stated they had no problems, with a mean degree of satisfaction at 8.4 (SD, 1.52). There were no significant differences for gender (P=.53). There was a very weak but significant positive correlation between the score and the age of those questioned (r(2)=1%; P=.03). Mean score of satisfaction had statistically significant differences, depending on the PCC. 86.9% (95% CI, 83.8-90.1) of users collected the prescriptions within the term set. The factors associated with greater adherence were age and a greater number of medicines per person. Doctors filled in 47 questionnaires. Mean score was 7.42 (SD, 1.09) and all except one (98%; 95% CI, 89.1-99.9) thought that the system meant an improvement in clinical management.
conclusionUsers are very satisfied, although they believe certain organisational points should be improved in order to improve accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.