Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17426707›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2007

No efficacy of annual gynaecological screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers; an observational follow-up study.

B B J Hermsen, R I Olivier, R H M Verheijen, M van Beurden, J A de Hullu, L F Massuger, C W Burger, C T Brekelmans, M J Mourits, G H de Bock and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Contemporary risk assessment and risk-reducing strategies for tubo-ovarian cancer in women with BRCA pathogenic variants.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High-Grade Serous Carcinoma at Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Asymptomatic Carriers ofJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

B B J HermsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R I Olivier
R H M Verheijen
M van Beurden
J A de Hullu
L F Massuger
C W Burger
C T Brekelmans
M J Mourits
G H de Bock
K N Gaarenstroom
H H van Boven
T M Mooij
M A Rookus
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLLeiden University · NLOncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are offered gynaecological screening with the intention to reduce mortality by detecting ovarian cancer at an early stage. We examined compliance and efficacy of gynaecological screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. In this multicentre, observational, follow-up study we examined medical record data of a consecutive series of 888 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who started annual screening with transvaginal ultrasonography and serum CA125 between 1993 and 2005. The women were annually screened for 75% of their total period of follow-up. Compliance decreased with longer follow-up. Five of the 10 incident cancers were interval tumours, diagnosed in women with a normal screening result within 3-10 months before diagnosis. No difference in stage distribution between incident screen-detected and interval tumours was found. Eight of the 10 incident cancers were stage III/IV (80%). Cancers diagnosed in unscreened family members had a similar stage distribution (77% in stage III/IV). The observed number of cases detected during screening was not significantly higher than expected (Standardized Incidence Ratio (SIR): 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.7-2.8). For the subgroup that was fully compliant to annual screening, a similar SIR was found (1.6, 95% confidence interval: 0.5-3.6). Despite annual gynaecological screening, a high proportion of ovarian cancers in BRCA1/2 carriers are interval cancers and the large majority of all cancers are diagnosed in advanced stages. Therefore, it is unlikely that annual screening will reduce mortality from ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Indexed as

MutationAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCA-125 AntigenCarrier StateFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingObservationOvarian NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCA-125 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID17426707
PMCPMC2360170
OpenAlexW2087480162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.