Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17425549›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2007

Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds.

Florent Jurczak, Thierry Dugré, Alison Johnstone, Theodor Offori, Zorica Vujovic, Dirk Hollander, AQUACEL Ag Surgical/Trauma Wound Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic applications of nanobiotechnology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  9. Silver Nanoparticles Phytofabricated throughAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Traditional Therapies for Skin Wound Healing.Advances in wound care · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Post-facelift flap necrosis treatment using charged polystyrene microspheres.The Canadian journal of plastic surgery = Journal canadien de chirurgie plastique · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Florent JurczakPolyclinique de l'Océan, Saint Nazaire, France. jurczak@wanadoo.fr
Thierry Dugré
Alison Johnstone
Theodor Offori
Zorica Vujovic
Dirk Hollander
AQUACEL Ag Surgical/Trauma Wound Study Group
Centre Hospitalier Saint-Nazaire · FRCentre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin · FRGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBRWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective, randomised clinical trial compared pain, comfort, exudate management, wound healing and safety with Hydrofiber dressing with ionic silver (Hydrofiber Ag dressing) and with povidone-iodine gauze for the treatment of open surgical and traumatic wounds. Patients were treated with Hydrofiber Ag dressing or povidone-iodine gauze for up to 2 weeks. Pain severity was measured with a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Other parameters were assessed clinically with various scales. Pain VAS scores decreased during dressing removal in both groups, and decreased while the dressing was in place in the Hydrofiber Ag dressing group (n = 35) but not in the povidone-iodine gauze group (n = 32). Pain VAS scores were similar between treatment groups. At final evaluation, Hydrofiber Ag dressing was significantly better than povidone-iodine gauze for overall ability to manage pain (P < 0.001), overall comfort (P < or = 0.001), wound trauma on dressing removal (P = 0.001), exudate handling (P < 0.001) and ease of use (P < or = 0.001). Rates of complete healing at study completion were 23% for Hydrofiber Ag dressing and 9% for povidone-iodine gauze (P = ns). No adverse events were reported with Hydrofiber Ag dressing; one subject discontinued povidone-iodine gauze due to adverse skin reaction. Hydrofiber Ag dressing supported wound healing and reduced overall pain compared with povidone-iodine gauze in the treatment of open surgical wounds requiring an antimicrobial dressing.

Indexed as

Occlusive DressingsAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPovidone-IodineProspective StudiesSilver SulfadiazineWound HealingWounds and InjuriesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumPovidone-IodineSilver Sulfadiazine

Identifiers

PMID17425549
PMCPMC7951761
OpenAlexW2001926097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.