ArticleBrain topography1991
Spatial mapping of SEP in comatose patients: improved outcome prediction by combined parietal N20 and frontal N30 analysis.
Article in Brain topography, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose children: a systematic literature review.Intensive care medicine · 2010Pooled it
- Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2005Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether SEP spatial mapping can improve outcome prediction in comparison to the conventional SEP recordings. Twenty patients comatose as a result of head injury or cerebral vascular disorders were submitted to 19-channel SEP mapping from median nerve stimulation. SEP recording were performed within the 4th hospital day in 18 cases and over one month from the insult in the remaining two. Nine patients (45%) showed a good recovery or a mild disability, 3 (15%) a severe disability and the rest (40%) died or remained in a vegetative state. Five patients (28%) had bilaterally normal SEP, 5 (28%) the absence of both parietal N20 and frontal N30, while the others (44%) had a dissociation N20/N30 (namely, preserved N20 with absent N30). The SEP mapping was significantly related to the outcome (P = 0.0087) and improved the outcome prediction in comparison to the conventional SEP recordings, allowing to check the presence of frontal N30: in patients with bilaterally present N20 the outcome appeared to depend upon the N30. SEP mapping proved to be a far superior prognostic indicator than the Glasgow Coma Scale. In 3 patients with midline shift on CT scan an abnormal spatial distribution of N20 was disclosed by SEP mapping. Our preliminary results suggest that SEP mapping may improve the assessment of comatose patients in comparison to the use of parietal derivations only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.