ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2007
Percutaneous ventricular assist during aortic valvuloplasty: potential application to the deployment of aortic stent-valves.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with a severe aortic stenosis and cardiogenic shock requiring intra-aortic balloon pump support.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the short-term safety and efficacy of using the TandemHeart(R) percutaneous ventricular assist device in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valvuloplasty procedures. Aortic valvuloplasty was performed in 4 patients who had no ventricular assist device support and in 7 patients who used the TandemHeart for hemodynamic support. The age range was 65 to 94 years (mean, 83 +/- 11 yr). The mean ejection fraction was 0.30 +/- 0.14. A transseptal antegrade approach to the aortic valve was used in 8 patients and a retrograde approach in the remaining 3. WITH THE TANDEMHEART, ALL PROCEDURES WERE TECHNICALLY SUCCESSFUL: each patient survived at least 1 month after the procedure. The mean total balloon inflation time was 37 +/- 10 sec. The aortic valve area was 0.6 +/- 0.1 cm(2) before the procedure and 0.9 +/- 0.2 cm(2) afterwards (P=0.006). Without TandemHeart support, 1 patient died of cardiac arrest during the procedure. The mean total balloon inflation time was 11 +/- 3 sec. Aortic valve area was 0.6 +/- 0 cm(2) before the procedure and 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm(2) afterwards (P=0.3). No patient developed aortic regurgitation. We conclude that use of the TandemHeart for hemodynamic support during high-risk aortic valvuloplasty is associated with favorable intraprocedural and short-term outcomes. With the TandemHeart in place, balloon placement was precise, and inflation was maintained for up to 45 sec without balloon displacement. These attributes are essential during stent-valve placement, are achieved without rapid ventricular pacing, and may reduce the risk of global ischemia and death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17420791PMC1847938W127775406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.