Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17420184›Full record

ArticleGenome research2007

The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes.

Matthew J Oliver, Dmitri Petrov, David Ackerly, Paul Falkowski, Oscar M Schofield

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Genomic Conceptualization of Species.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome size variation withinEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  9. Genome Evolution and the Future of Phylogenomics of Non-Avian Reptiles.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  10. Transposable elements promote the evolution of genome streamlining.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew J OliverInstitute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA. oliver@imcs.rutgers.edu
Dmitri Petrov
David Ackerly
Paul Falkowski
Oscar M Schofield

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genome size varies over five orders of magnitude; however, the distribution is strongly skewed toward small values. Genome size is highly correlated to a number of phenotypic traits, suggesting that the relative lack of large genomes in eukaryotes is due to selective removal. Using phylogenetic contrasts, we show that the rate of genome size evolution is proportional to genome size, with the fastest rates occurring in the largest genomes. This trend is evident across the 20 major eukaryotic clades analyzed, indicating that over long time scales, proportional change is the dominant and universal mode of genome-size evolution in eukaryotes. Our results reveal that the evolution of eukaryotic genome size can be described by a simple proportional model of evolution. This model explains the skewed distribution of eukaryotic genome sizes without invoking strong selection against large genomes.

Indexed as

Eukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsEukaryotaGenome, HumanGenome, PlantHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID17420184
PMCPMC1855170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.