Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17418054›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2007

Nutritional immunomodulation of acute pancreatitis.

Refaat A F Hegazi, Stephen J D O'Keefe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A guide to enteral access procedures and enteral nutrition.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Refaat A F HegaziDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Stephen J D O'Keefe

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the great advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis, no specific therapy has emerged, and treatment remains supportive. In patients with the severe form of the disease, in which mortality remains high at 20% to 30%, the function of the upper gastrointestinal tract is disturbed due to extrinsic compression by the inflamed and swollen pancreas, and normal eating is impossible. Such patients often develop multiple organ failure, necessitating intensive-care management and artificial ventilation for weeks on end. In this setting, protein catabolism will rapidly result in protein deficiency and further complications unless nutritional support is commenced. Recent studies have shown that, despite the risk of disease exacerbation through pancreatic stimulation, enteral feeding is more effective than parenteral feeding in improving outcome. Experimental studies suggest that this can be attributed to its content of specific immunomodulating nutrients, such as glutamine, arginine, and n-3 fatty acids, and by its stabilizing effect on the gut flora through the provision of prebiotics. Further studies are indicated to examine whether dietary enrichment with these substrates, along with regulation of the gut bacteria with probiotics, can improve outcome further.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionAcute DiseaseAnimalsCytokinesDisease ProgressionFood, FormulatedGlutamineHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansHyperglycemiaMultiple Organ FailurePancreatitisParenteral Nutrition, TotalProbioticsTh2 CellsTreatment OutcomeCytokinesGlutamineHSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.