Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17416853›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2007

Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.

Sining Chen, Giovanni Parmigiani

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 807 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
807citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03511690 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Testing an Intelligent Tutoring System Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Blacks and Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled95ConditionsHereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerArmsBRCA-Gist
NCT03959267 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Testing a Culturally Adapted Telephone Genetic Counseling Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled37ConditionsBreast Cancer, Hereditary Breast CancerArmsTelephone Genetic Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

807 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. TALAVE in Breast Cancer:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

747 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sining ChenDepartments of Environmental Health Sciences and Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. sichen@jhsph.edu
Giovanni Parmigiani

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LENNON, ANNE MARIE · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
VACCINES--A NEW PARADIGM FOR BREAST CANCERP50CA088843 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, NANCY ELLEN · 2000 to 2010
$27.8M
Statistical Methods for Cancer GenesR01CA105090 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PARMIGIANI, GIOVANNI · 2004 to 2007
$997k
Mechanisms of 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced hypotensionF30HL099024 · NHLBI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, ROBERT PATRICK · 2010 to 2013
$137k
NCI NIH HHS 5P30 CA06973-39NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS P50 CA088843NCI NIH HHS P50CA62924-05NCI NIH HHS P50CA88843NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105090NCI NIH HHS R01CA105090NHLBI NIH HHS HL99-024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenetic counseling is now routinely offered to individuals at high risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Risk prediction provided by the counselor requires reliable estimates of the mutation penetrance. Such penetrance has been investigated by studies worldwide. The reported estimates vary. To facilitate clinical management and counseling of the at-risk population, we address this issue through a meta-analysis.

methodsWe conducted a literature search on PubMed and selected studies that had nonoverlapping patient data, contained genotyping information, used statistical methods that account for the ascertainment, and reported risks in a useable format. We subsequently combined the published estimates using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects modeling approach.

resultsTen studies were eligible under the selection criteria. Between-study heterogeneity was observed. Study population, mutation type, design, and estimation methods did not seem to be systematic sources of heterogeneity. Meta-analytic mean cumulative cancer risks for mutation carriers at age 70 years were as follows: breast cancer risk of 57% (95% CI, 47% to 66%) for BRCA1 and 49% (95% CI, 40% to 57%) for BRCA2 mutation carriers; and ovarian cancer risk of 40% (95% CI, 35% to 46%) for BRCA1 and 18% (95% CI, 13% to 23%) for BRCA2 mutation carriers. We also report the prospective risks of developing cancer for currently asymptomatic carriers.

conclusionThis article provides a set of risk estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers that can be used by counselors and clinicians who are interested in advising patients based on a comprehensive set of studies rather than one specific study.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePenetranceBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansMutationOvarian Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID17416853
PMCPMC2267287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.