Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17415632›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2007

A meta-analysis of antibiotic therapy for active ulcerative colitis.

Roja Rahimi, Shekoufeh Nikfar, Ali Rezaie, Mohammad Abdollahi

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roja RahimiFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shekoufeh Nikfar
Ali Rezaie
Mohammad Abdollahi
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran Nanohealth Committee Food and Drug Organization · IRUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically evaluate the efficacy of antibacterial therapy in ulcerative colitis, we carried out a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Within the time period 1966 through September 2006, PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for clinical trial studies that investigated the efficacy of antibiotics in ulcerative colitis. We considered clinical remission as our key outcome of interest. Of 122 studies, 10 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials matched our criteria and were included in the analysis (530 patients). All the studies used antibiotics as an adjunct therapy to conventional treatment of ulcerative colitis (i.e., corticosteroids and 5-aminosalycilic acid). Pooling of these trials yielded odds ratio (OR) of 2.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-3.09; P<0.0001) in favor of antimicrobial therapy. Meta-analysis of short-term trials (5-14 days) showed a higher rate of clinical remission in patients treated with antibiotics (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.36-3). These results suggest that adjunctive antibacterial therapy is effective for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsColitis, UlcerativeControlled Clinical Trials as TopicHumansRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID17415632
OpenAlexW2139292651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.