Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17415317›Full record

ArticleMedGenMed : Medscape general medicine2006

A survey of neurologists on bothersome patient behaviors.

Randolph W Evans, Rochelle E Evans, Richard I Evans

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of No-Show in Neurology Clinics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Randolph W EvansWeill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. rwevans@pol.net
Rochelle E Evans
Richard I Evans
Cornell University · USRice University · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAlthough much has been published on patient complaints about physicians, little is known about patient behaviors that physicians find bothersome.

objectiveTo obtain more information about bothersome patient behaviors, we performed a pilot survey of neurologists.

methodsA survey was performed among neurologists attending the Texas Neurological Society Winter Conference in 2006 in Austin, Texas. Using 5-point Likert scales, respondents rated 30 patient behaviors on how often they observed or experienced the behavior in the last year and how bothersome the behavior was to them. Respondents were asked to list their top 5 most bothersome patient behaviors, provide examples of unnecessary phone calls received after hours, and provide any other comments about the survey.

resultsThe response rate was 42.3% (78 respondents). Almost all of the patient behaviors were found to be bothersome or very bothersome. The top 5 most bothersome patient behaviors from most to least were the following: no show for appointment, verbally abusive with your staff, poor compliance with medications or treatment, late for appointment, and do not know the medications that they are taking. Of the 30 items, those behaviors as well as answering cell phones during office visits and unnecessary phone calls after hours were among the most highly rated as bothersome.

conclusionsSome of the bothersome patient behaviors may have deleterious effects on patient care, whereas others may make the practice of medicine unpleasant for physicians. A number of the behaviors may be reduced by providing patients with practice policies. Others are best addressed through ongoing communication and education.

Indexed as

BehaviorNeurologyPhysician-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionHumansPatient CompliancePhysiciansPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID17415317
PMCPMC1868354
OpenAlexW161010190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.