Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17414428›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2007

Mechanisms of direct peritoneal resuscitation-mediated splanchnic hyperperfusion following hemorrhagic shock.

El Rasheid Zakaria, Na Li, Richard N Garrison

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Current operative approaches for necrotizing enterocolitis.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hemorrhage-induced hepatic injury and hypoperfusion can be prevented by direct peritoneal resuscitation.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

El Rasheid ZakariaDepartment of Physiology, Health Sciences Center , University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA. erzaka01@louisville.edu
Na Li
Richard N Garrison
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation from Hypovolemic ShockR01HL076160 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GARRISON, RICHARD N · 2004 to 2007
$872k
NHLBI NIH HHS 5R01 HL076160-03NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional resuscitation (CR) from hemorrhagic shock causes a persistent and progressive splanchnic vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion despite hemodynamic restoration with intravenous fluid therapy. Adjunctive direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) with a clinical peritoneal dialysis solution instilled into the peritoneal cavity has been shown to restore splanchnic tissue perfusion, down-regulate the gut-derived exaggerated systemic inflammatory response, promote early fluid mobilization, and improve overall outcome. This study was conducted to define the molecular mechanisms of DPR-induced gut hyperperfusion after hemorrhagic shock. Male rats were bled to 50% baseline mean arterial pressure and resuscitated with the shed blood plus two volumes of saline (CR). In vivo videomicroscopy and Doppler velocimetry were used to assess terminal ileal microvascular diameters and blood flow. Direct peritoneal resuscitation animals received CR and topical application of a clinical glucose-based peritoneal dialysis solution (Delflex). Inhibitors, glibenclamide (K(+)ATP channels), N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (nitric oxide synthase), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-diprophylxanthine (DPCPX) (A1 adenosine receptor), tetrabutylammonium (K(+)Ca2+ channels), and mefenamic acid (cyclooxygenase) were topically applied (individually or in combination) with DPR according to protocol; BQ-123 (endothelin A receptor antagonist) and BQ-788 (endothelin B receptor antagonist) were used topically with CR to define the mechanism of post-CR vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion. Conventional resuscitation caused a persistent progressive intestinal vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion that can be abolished with endothelin antagonists. In contrast, adjunctive DPR caused an instantaneous sustained vasodilation and hyperperfusion. Glibenclamide or L-NMMA partially attenuated DPR-induced vasodilation, whereas the addition of DPCPX to the two inhibitors eliminated the dilation. Cyclooxygenase and K(+)Ca2+channels were not active in DPR-mediated microvascular effects. In conclusion, DPR improves splanchnic tissue perfusion by endothelium-dependent mechanisms mediated by activations of glibenclamide-sensitive K(+) channels (KATP), adenosine A1 receptor subtype activation, and nitric oxide release. Direct peritoneal resuscitation preserves endothelial dilatory functions, thereby overriding any endothelium-derived constrictor response triggered by hemorrhagic shock and CR.

Indexed as

ReperfusionResuscitationAnimalsIntestinal MucosaMalePeritoneal CavityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyShock, HemorrhagicSplanchnic Circulation

Identifiers

PMID17414428
PMCPMC2121218
OpenAlexW2023495203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.