Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17412737›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2007

Open-label, pilot protocol of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switch to infliximab after an incomplete response to etanercept: the opposite study.

Daniel E Furst, Norman Gaylis, Vance Bray, Ewa Olech, David Yocum, Jeffrey Ritter, Michael Weisman, Daniel J Wallace, John Crues, Dinesh Khanna and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. My treatment approach to rheumatoid arthritis.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2012
    Guideline
  6. Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cycling of tumor necrosis factor inhibitorsTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Daniel E FurstDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1670, USA. DEFurst@mednet.ucla.edu
Norman Gaylis
Vance Bray
Ewa Olech
David Yocum
Jeffrey Ritter
Michael Weisman
Daniel J Wallace
John Crues
Dinesh Khanna
Gregory Eckel
Newman Yeilding
Peter Callegari
Sudha Visvanathan
Jeannie Rojas
Ronald Hegedus
Laura George
Khalid Mamun
Keith Gilmer
Orrin Troum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo incorporate a new trial design to examine clinical response, cytokine expression and joint imaging in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) switching from etanercept to infliximab treatment.

methodsA randomised, open-label, clinical trial of 28 patients with an inadequate response to etanercept was conducted. Eligible patients received background methotrexate and were randomised 1:1 to discontinue etanercept and receive infliximab 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22, or to continue etanercept 25 mg twice weekly. Data were analysed for clinical response, serum biomarker levels, radiographic progression, MRI and adverse events.

resultsAt week 16, 62% of infliximab-treated patients achieved American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement in RA (ACR20) responses compared with 29% of etanercept-treated patients. A 30.8% decrease from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 was observed in patients receiving infliximab, compared with a 16.0% decrease in patients receiving etanercept. ACR20 and American College of Rheumatology 50% criteria for improvement in RA responses correlated at least minimally with intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and interleukin 8 in patients receiving infliximab. 38% of patients who were switched to infliximab showed reductions in Health Assessment Questionnaire scores (>0.4), compared with 0% of patients receiving etanercept. MRI analyses were inconclusive. Both drugs were well tolerated; 54% of infliximab-treated patients and 50% of etanercept-treated patients reported adverse events.

conclusionsIn this exploratory, open-label trial (with single-blind evaluator), patients were randomised to continue with etanercept or switch to infliximab. The small sample size of this hypothesis-generating study was underpowered to show statistical differences between groups. There was a numerical trend favouring patients who switched to infliximab, therefore warranting further study with a more rigorous design.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersEtanerceptFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInfliximabMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GInfliximabReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

Identifiers

PMID17412737
PMCPMC1955098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.