Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17412305›Full record

ReviewAutoimmunity reviews2007

Moving towards efficient therapies in type 1 diabetes: to combine or not to combine?

D Bresson, M von Herrath

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autoimmunity reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Naturally occurring anthraquinones: chemistry and therapeutic potential in autoimmune diabetes.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stem cell therapy for diabetes mellitus.Kidney international supplements · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gene therapy in diabetes.Self/nonself · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D BressonLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Developmental Immunology, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
M von Herrath
La Jolla Institute for Immunology · US

Funding

USE OF REGULATORY APCS TO INDUCE/MAINTAIN TOLERANCEU19AI051973 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INST FOR ALLERGY &IMMUNOLGY · PI VON HERRATH, MATTHIAS G. · 2001 to 2005
$4.4M
Achieving Therapeutic Antigent-Specific Tolerance in Type 1 DiabetesU01DK078013 · NIDDK · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI VON HERRATH, MATTHIAS G. · 2006 to 2011
$2.7M
Role of a Non-Tolerant Autoantigen in AutoimmunityR01AI044451 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VON HERRATH, MATTHIAS G. · 1998 to 2007
$1.5M
DNA Vaccination &Regulatory Cells in Type I DiabetesR01DK051091 · NIDDK · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI VON HERRATH, MATTHIAS G. · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
PATHOGENESIS AND TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE DIABETESR29DK051091 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VON HERRATH, MATTHIAS G. · 1996 to 2001
$180k
NIAID NIH HHS AI51973NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044451NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI051973NIDDK NIH HHS DK51091NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK051091NIDDK NIH HHS R29 DK051091NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK078013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every year, thirty thousand people worldwide are diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). T1DM, also called autoimmune diabetes, is a multifactorial disease affecting predisposed individuals and involving genetic susceptibilities, environmental triggers, as well as unbalanced immune responses. Auto-reactive T cells, produced during the pathogenesis, play an important role by specifically destroying the pancreatic insulin-producing beta-cells in the islets of Langerhans. Numerous therapeutic interventions have been tested, mostly in animal models, but also in humans. To date, only three phase II/III clinical trials have demonstrated safety and efficacy: anti-CD3 antibody, DiaPep277, and GAD65 (in patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults). Unfortunately, a significant number of patients did not respond positively and remained insulin-dependent after completion of therapy. Several reasons account for this. Firstly, the severity of the disease as well as the auto-aggressive T cell repertoire vary from patient to patient leading to a broad range of therapeutic efficacies, and secondly at the time of the treatment the number of remaining beta-cells will directly impact the level of insulin production post-treatment. In this review, we will provide some clues to enhance efficacy of future immuno-interventions in patients with T1DM. We suggest that combination therapies might be the best approach.

Indexed as

Drug Therapy, CombinationImmunizationAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID17412305
PMCPMC1896372
OpenAlexW1972066210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.