ArticlePLoS computational biology2007
Integration of genome and chromatin structure with gene expression profiles to predict c-MYC recognition site binding and function.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNA-27a-5p regulation by promoter methylation and MYC signaling in prostate carcinogenesis.Cell death & disease · 2018Article
- A DNA shape-based regulatory score improves position-weight matrix-based recognition of transcription factor binding sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Applications of alignment-free methods in epigenomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2014Review
- Regulation of Bach2 by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a mechanism for suppression of B-cell differentiation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2011Article
- Article
- A genomic strategy for the functional validation of colorectal cancer genes identifies potential therapeutic targets.International journal of cancer · 2011Article
- Bayesian analysis of high-throughput quantitative measurement of protein-DNA interactions.PloS one · 2011Article
- The action mechanism of the Myc inhibitor termed Omomyc may give clues on how to target Myc for cancer therapy.PloS one · 2011Article
- Occupancy classification of position weight matrix-inferred transcription factor binding sites.PloS one · 2011Article
- An integrated genomic analysis of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated inhibition of B-cell differentiation.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2010Article
- p53 binds preferentially to genomic regions with high DNA-encoded nucleosome occupancy.Genome research · 2010Article
- Integrating multiple evidence sources to predict transcription factor binding in the human genome.Genome research · 2010Article
- Article
- The ups and downs of Myc biology.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2010Review
- Quantitative nanoproteomics for protein complexes (QNanoPX) related to estrogen transcriptional action.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2010Article
- Article
- A core MYC gene expression signature is prominent in basal-like breast cancer but only partially overlaps the core serum response.PloS one · 2009Article
- Gene expression profiling differentiates autism case-controls and phenotypic variants of autism spectrum disorders: evidence for circadian rhythm dysfunction in severe autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2009Article
- High-throughput chromatin information enables accurate tissue-specific prediction of transcription factor binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- Combined analysis of murine and human microarrays and ChIP analysis reveals genes associated with the ability of MYC to maintain tumorigenesis.PLoS genetics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The MYC genes encode nuclear sequence specific-binding DNA-binding proteins that are pleiotropic regulators of cellular function, and the c-MYC proto-oncogene is deregulated and/or mutated in most human cancers. Experimental studies of MYC binding to the genome are not fully consistent. While many c-MYC recognition sites can be identified in c-MYC responsive genes, other motif matches-even experimentally confirmed sites-are associated with genes showing no c-MYC response. We have developed a computational model that integrates multiple sources of evidence to predict which genes will bind and be regulated by MYC in vivo. First, a Bayesian network classifier is used to predict those c-MYC recognition sites that are most likely to exhibit high-occupancy binding in chromatin immunoprecipitation studies. This classifier incorporates genomic sequence, experimentally determined genomic chromatin acetylation islands, and predicted methylation status from a computational model estimating the likelihood of genomic DNA methylation. We find that the predictions from this classifier are also applicable to other transcription factors, such as cAMP-response element-binding protein, whose binding sites are sensitive to DNA methylation. Second, the MYC binding probability is combined with the gene expression profile data from nine independent microarray datasets in multiple tissues. Finally, we may consider gene function annotations in Gene Ontology to predict the c-MYC targets. We assess the performance of our prediction results by comparing them with the c-myc targets identified in the biomedical literature. In total, we predict 460 likely c-MYC target genes in the human genome, of which 67 have been reported to be both bound and regulated by MYC, 68 are bound by MYC, and another 80 are MYC-regulated. The approach thus successfully identifies many known c-MYC targets and suggests many novel sites. Our findings suggest that to identify c-MYC genomic targets, integration of different data sources helps to improve the accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.