Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17411336›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2007

Integration of genome and chromatin structure with gene expression profiles to predict c-MYC recognition site binding and function.

Yili Chen, Thomas W Blackwell, Ji Chen, Jing Gao, Angel W Lee, David J States

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An integrated genomic analysis of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated inhibition of B-cell differentiation.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The ups and downs of Myc biology.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yili ChenBioinformatics Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Thomas W Blackwell
Ji Chen
Jing Gao
Angel W Lee
David J States
Michigan United · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Nation Center- Integrative Biomedical Informatics(RMI)U54DA021519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2005 to 2010
$21.3M
Representing and Acquiring Knowledge of Genome RegulatioR01LM008106 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STATES, DAVID J · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
MECHANISM OF CSF 1 RECEPTOR GROWTH, SURVIVAL PROMOTIONR01CA085368 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, ANGEL W · 2001 to 2004
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085368NCI NIH HHS R01 CA85368NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA021519NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MYC genes encode nuclear sequence specific-binding DNA-binding proteins that are pleiotropic regulators of cellular function, and the c-MYC proto-oncogene is deregulated and/or mutated in most human cancers. Experimental studies of MYC binding to the genome are not fully consistent. While many c-MYC recognition sites can be identified in c-MYC responsive genes, other motif matches-even experimentally confirmed sites-are associated with genes showing no c-MYC response. We have developed a computational model that integrates multiple sources of evidence to predict which genes will bind and be regulated by MYC in vivo. First, a Bayesian network classifier is used to predict those c-MYC recognition sites that are most likely to exhibit high-occupancy binding in chromatin immunoprecipitation studies. This classifier incorporates genomic sequence, experimentally determined genomic chromatin acetylation islands, and predicted methylation status from a computational model estimating the likelihood of genomic DNA methylation. We find that the predictions from this classifier are also applicable to other transcription factors, such as cAMP-response element-binding protein, whose binding sites are sensitive to DNA methylation. Second, the MYC binding probability is combined with the gene expression profile data from nine independent microarray datasets in multiple tissues. Finally, we may consider gene function annotations in Gene Ontology to predict the c-MYC targets. We assess the performance of our prediction results by comparing them with the c-myc targets identified in the biomedical literature. In total, we predict 460 likely c-MYC target genes in the human genome, of which 67 have been reported to be both bound and regulated by MYC, 68 are bound by MYC, and another 80 are MYC-regulated. The approach thus successfully identifies many known c-MYC targets and suggests many novel sites. Our findings suggest that to identify c-MYC genomic targets, integration of different data sources helps to improve the accuracy.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBinding SitesChromatinChromosome MappingComputer SimulationDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingModels, ChemicalProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProto-Oncogene MasSequence Analysis, ProteinStructure-Activity RelationshipSystems IntegrationTranscription FactorsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsMAS1 protein, humanMYCBP protein, humanProto-Oncogene MasTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17411336
PMCPMC1847699
OpenAlexW2094193386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.