Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17409210›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Evaluation of real-time PCR laboratory-developed tests using analyte-specific reagents for cytomegalovirus quantification.

Angela M Caliendo, Jessica Ingersoll, Andrea M Fox-Canale, Sabine Pargman, Tameka Bythwood, Mary K Hayden, James W Bremer, Nell S Lurain

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of cytomegalovirus DNA in cord blood and voided urine obtained from pregnant women at the end of pregnancy.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interpreting quantitative cytomegalovirus DNA testing: understanding the laboratory perspective.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M CaliendoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. acalien@emory.edu
Jessica Ingersoll
Andrea M Fox-Canale
Sabine Pargman
Tameka Bythwood
Mary K Hayden
James W Bremer
Nell S Lurain
Emory University · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
DAIDS VIROLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMN01AI035172 · NIAID · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BREMER, JAMES W. · 1993 to 1998
–
Ebola Vaccine DevelopmentZ01AI005004 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI NABEL, GARY J · 2002 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI35172NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI0500409NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral load testing for cytomegalovirus (CMV) has become the standard for the diagnosis of infection and monitoring of therapy at many transplant centers. However, no viral load test has been approved by the FDA. Therefore, many laboratories rely on laboratory-developed assays. This study evaluated the performance characteristics of two real-time PCR tests developed using the artus CMV analyte-specific reagents (ASRs). One version is distributed by Abbott Molecular and the other by QIAGEN. For plasma specimens, the Abbott test had a limit of detection of 2.3 log10 copies/ml and a linear range up to at least 6.0 log10 copies/ml. Comparison of plasma viral loads using the Abbott test and the Roche Amplicor Monitor test showed a mean difference of -0.012 log10 copies/ml. In addition, the Abbott test viral loads correlated with the Digene Hybrid Capture assay ratios. Viral loads obtained from plasma specimens tested by the Abbott and QIAGEN tests were in very close agreement (mean difference, 0.144 log10 copies/ml). When the QIAGEN test was evaluated with the QIAGEN, MagNA Pure, and easyMAG extraction methods, the viral loads for all three methods were within 0.370 log10 copies/ml. Thus, there is good agreement between viral loads obtained by the different tests using the same extraction method or by the same test using different extraction methods. The availability of real-time PCR ASRs provides additional reagents that can be used for CMV viral load testing.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticViral LoadCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA, ViralHumansIndicators and ReagentsPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA, ViralIndicators and ReagentsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID17409210
PMCPMC1933050
OpenAlexW2073412366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.