Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17409186›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila.

Stanley A Sawyer, John Parsch, Zhi Zhang, Daniel L Hartl

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. nala: text mining natural language mutation mentions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanley A SawyerDepartment of Mathematics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
John Parsch
Zhi Zhang
Daniel L Hartl
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHarvard University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND DIVERSITY IN MALARIAR01GM061351 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI WIRTH, DYANN F · 2000 to 2007
$3.7M
Evolutionary Genomics of DrosophilaR01GM068465 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HARTL, DANIEL L · 2004 to 2007
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM61351NIGMS NIH HHS GM68465NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061351NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have estimated the selective effects of amino acid replacements in natural populations by comparing levels of polymorphism in 91 genes in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster with their divergence from Drosophila simulans. The genes include about equal numbers whose level of expression in adults is greater in males, greater in females, or approximately equal in the sexes. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods were used to sample key parameters in the stationary distribution of polymorphism and divergence in a model in which the selective effect of each nonsynonymous mutation is regarded as a random sample from some underlying normal distribution whose mean may differ from one gene to the next. Our analysis suggests that approximately 95% of all nonsynonymous mutations that could contribute to polymorphism or divergence are deleterious, and that the average proportion of deleterious amino acid polymorphisms in samples is approximately 70%. On the other hand, approximately 95% of fixed differences between species are positively selected, although the scaled selection coefficient (N(e)s) is very small. We estimate that approximately 46% of amino acid replacements have N(e)s < 2, approximately 84% have N(e)s < 4, and approximately 99% have N(e)s < 7. Although positive selection among amino acid differences between species seems pervasive, most of the selective effects could be regarded as nearly neutral. There are significant differences in selection between sex-biased and unbiased genes, which relate primarily to the mean of the distributions of mutational effects and the fraction of slightly deleterious and weakly beneficial mutations that are fixed.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticAmino Acids, NeutralAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMaleMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodMutationPolymorphism, GeneticSpecies SpecificityAmino Acids, NeutralDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17409186
PMCPMC1871816
OpenAlexW2135662698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.