Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17409078›Full record

ArticleGenetics2007

An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets.

Maciej F Boni, David Posada, Marcus W Feldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 390 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
390citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

390 citing papers in PubMed, 785 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population Genetic Study ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

330 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maciej F BoniStanford Genome Technology Center, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA. maciek@charles.stanford.edu
David Posada
Marcus W Feldman
Stanford University · USUniversidade de Vigo · ES

Funding

WHOLE YEAST GENOME TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL GENE MAPS--A FEASIBILITY STUDYP01HG000205 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HOWE, ROGER THOMAS, JI, HANLEE P · 1990 to 2016
$120.9M
POPULATION GENETICS THEORYR01GM028016 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MARCUS W · 1985 to 2010
$2.5M
A NEW ES CELL DELETION RESOURCE AND WILLIAMS SYNDROMEF32HG000205 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI GOODWIN, NEAL C · 1999 to 1999
–
NHGRI NIH HHS F32 HG000205NHGRI NIH HHS HG000205NHGRI NIH HHS P01 HG000205NIGMS NIH HHS GM28016NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical tests for detecting mosaic structure or recombination among nucleotide sequences usually rely on identifying a pattern or a signal that would be unlikely to appear under clonal reproduction. Dozens of such tests have been described, but many are hampered by long running times, confounding of selection and recombination, and/or inability to isolate the mosaic-producing event. We introduce a test that is exact, nonparametric, rapidly computable, free of the infinite-sites assumption, able to distinguish between recombination and variation in mutation/fixation rates, and able to identify the breakpoints and sequences involved in the mosaic-producing event. Our test considers three sequences at a time: two parent sequences that may have recombined, with one or two breakpoints, to form the third sequence (the child sequence). Excess similarity of the child sequence to a candidate recombinant of the parents is a sign of recombination; we take the maximum value of this excess similarity as our test statistic Delta(m,n,b). We present a method for rapidly calculating the distribution of Delta(m,n,b) and demonstrate that it has comparable power to and a much improved running time over previous methods, especially in detecting recombination in large data sets.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticMosaicismAdultChildFemaleGenetic VariationHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMaleMutationRecombination, GeneticStatistics, NonparametricTriplets

Identifiers

PMID17409078
PMCPMC1894573
OpenAlexW2095886196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.