Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17408372›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2007

Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by modifying the properties of antigen-presenting cells.

Shaw-Wei D Tsen, Augustine H Paik, Chien-Fu Hung, T-C Wu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Therapeutic vaccines for high-risk HPV-associated diseases.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immunotherapy for cervical cancer: Research status and clinical potential.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaw-Wei D TsenDepartment of Pathology, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. tsen@jhu.edu
Augustine H Paik
Chien-Fu Hung
T-C Wu
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TZYY-CHOOU WU · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
ENHANCING HPV-16 E6-SPECIFIC ANTITUMOR IMMUNITYR01CA114425 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WU, TZYY-CHOOU · 2005 to 2016
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccines represent a potentially promising approach for antigen-specific immunotherapy. Advances in our knowledge of the adaptive immune system have indicated that professional antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells (DCs), play a key role in the generation of antigen-specific immune responses. Thus, the modification of the properties of DCs represents an important strategy for enhancing the potency of DNA vaccines. This review discusses strategies to increase the number of antigen-expressing DCs, enhance antigen expression, processing and presentation in DCs, promote the activation and function of DCs, and improve DC and T-cell interaction, in order to optimize DNA vaccine-elicited immune responses. Continuing progress in our understanding of DC and T-cell biology serves as a foundation for further improvement of DNA vaccine potency, which may lead to future clinical applications of DNA vaccines for the control of infectious diseases and malignancies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigensDendritic CellsDrug DesignHumansT-LymphocytesVaccines, DNAAntigensVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID17408372
PMCPMC3190226
OpenAlexW2006516575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.