Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17408331›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2007

Elasticity imaging of polymeric media.

Mallika Sridhar, Jie Liu, Michael F Insana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Material properties from acoustic radiation force step response.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009
    Article
  8. Fractional derivative models for ultrasonic characterization of polymer and breast tissue viscoelasticity.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mallika SridharUniversity of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jie Liu
Michael F Insana
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

ULTRASONIC ELASTICITY IMAGING OF THE BREASTR01CA082497 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI INSANA, MICHAEL F · 1999 to 2008
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA82497NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viscoelastic properties of soft tissues and hydropolymers depend on the strength of molecular bonding forces connecting the polymer matrix and surrounding fluids. The basis for diagnostic imaging is that disease processes alter molecular-scale bonding in ways that vary the measurable stiffness and viscosity of the tissues. This paper reviews linear viscoelastic theory as applied to gelatin hydrogels for the purpose of formulating approaches to molecular-scale interpretation of elasticity imaging in soft biological tissues. Comparing measurements acquired under different geometries, we investigate the limitations of viscoelastic parameters acquired under various imaging conditions. Quasi-static (step-and-hold and low-frequency harmonic) stimuli applied to gels during creep and stress relaxation experiments in confined and unconfined geometries reveal continuous, bimodal distributions of respondance times. Within the linear range of responses, gelatin will behave more like a solid or fluid depending on the stimulus magnitude. Gelatin can be described statistically from a few parameters of low-order rheological models that form the basis of viscoelastic imaging. Unbiased estimates of imaging parameters are obtained only if creep data are acquired for greater than twice the highest retardance time constant and any steady-state viscous response has been eliminated. Elastic strain and retardance time images are found to provide the best combination of contrast and signal strength in gelatin. Retardance times indicate average behavior of fast (1-10 s) fluid flows and slow (50-400 s) matrix restructuring in response to the mechanical stimulus. Insofar as gelatin mimics other polymers, such as soft biological tissues, elasticity imaging can provide unique insights into complex structural and biochemical features of connectives tissues affected by disease.

Indexed as

CollagenCompressive StrengthConnective TissueElasticityGelatinImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedModels, ChemicalPoisson DistributionPolymersReproducibility of ResultsRheologySpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTime FactorsUltrasonicsUltrasonographyViscosityCollagenGelatinPolymers

Identifiers

PMID17408331
PMCPMC2793538
OpenAlexW2053559990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.