ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2007
Elasticity imaging of polymeric media.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing composition and structure of soft biphasic media from Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative model parameters.Measurement science & technology · 2017Article
- Virtual Breast Quasi-static Elastography (VBQE).Ultrasonic imaging · 2017Article
- Characterization of material properties of soft solid thin layers with acoustic radiation force and wave propagation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015Article
- Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem.Physics in medicine and biology · 2012Article
- Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.Physics in medicine and biology · 2010Article
- Magnetomotive nanoparticle transducers for optical rheology of viscoelastic materials.Optics express · 2009Article
- Material properties from acoustic radiation force step response.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009Article
- Fractional derivative models for ultrasonic characterization of polymer and breast tissue viscoelasticity.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2009Article
- pH-induced contrast in viscoelasticity imaging of biopolymers.Physics in medicine and biology · 2009Article
- Ultrasonic measurements of breast viscoelasticity.Medical physics · 2007Article
- Viscoelasticity imaging using ultrasound: parameters and error analysis.Physics in medicine and biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Viscoelastic properties of soft tissues and hydropolymers depend on the strength of molecular bonding forces connecting the polymer matrix and surrounding fluids. The basis for diagnostic imaging is that disease processes alter molecular-scale bonding in ways that vary the measurable stiffness and viscosity of the tissues. This paper reviews linear viscoelastic theory as applied to gelatin hydrogels for the purpose of formulating approaches to molecular-scale interpretation of elasticity imaging in soft biological tissues. Comparing measurements acquired under different geometries, we investigate the limitations of viscoelastic parameters acquired under various imaging conditions. Quasi-static (step-and-hold and low-frequency harmonic) stimuli applied to gels during creep and stress relaxation experiments in confined and unconfined geometries reveal continuous, bimodal distributions of respondance times. Within the linear range of responses, gelatin will behave more like a solid or fluid depending on the stimulus magnitude. Gelatin can be described statistically from a few parameters of low-order rheological models that form the basis of viscoelastic imaging. Unbiased estimates of imaging parameters are obtained only if creep data are acquired for greater than twice the highest retardance time constant and any steady-state viscous response has been eliminated. Elastic strain and retardance time images are found to provide the best combination of contrast and signal strength in gelatin. Retardance times indicate average behavior of fast (1-10 s) fluid flows and slow (50-400 s) matrix restructuring in response to the mechanical stimulus. Insofar as gelatin mimics other polymers, such as soft biological tissues, elasticity imaging can provide unique insights into complex structural and biochemical features of connectives tissues affected by disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.