Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17407547›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Porcine transcriptome analysis based on 97 non-normalized cDNA libraries and assembly of 1,021,891 expressed sequence tags.

Jan Gorodkin, Susanna Cirera, Jakob Hedegaard, Michael J Gilchrist, Frank Panitz, Claus Jørgensen, Karsten Scheibye-Knudsen, Troels Arvin, Steen Lumholdt, Milena Sawera and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-wide profiling of Sus scrofa circular RNAs across nine organs and three developmental stages.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Jan GorodkinDivision of Genetics and Bioinformatics, IBHV, Grønnegärdsvej 3, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. gorodkin@genome.ku.dk
Susanna Cirera
Jakob Hedegaard
Michael J Gilchrist
Frank Panitz
Claus Jørgensen
Karsten Scheibye-Knudsen
Troels Arvin
Steen Lumholdt
Milena Sawera
Trine Green
Bente J Nielsen
Jakob H Havgaard
Carina Rosenkilde
Jun Wang
Heng Li
Ruiqiang Li
Bin Liu
Songnian Hu
Wei Dong
Wei Li
Jun Yu
Jian Wang
Hans-Henrik Staefeldt
Rasmus Wernersson
Lone B Madsen
Bo Thomsen
Henrik Hornshøj
Zhan Bujie
Xuegang Wang
Xuefei Wang
Lars Bolund
Søren Brunak
Huanming Yang
Christian Bendixen
Merete Fredholm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of the structure of gene expression is essential for mammalian transcriptomics research. We analyzed a collection of more than one million porcine expressed sequence tags (ESTs), of which two-thirds were generated in the Sino-Danish Pig Genome Project and one-third are from public databases. The Sino-Danish ESTs were generated from one normalized and 97 non-normalized cDNA libraries representing 35 different tissues and three developmental stages.

resultsUsing the Distiller package, the ESTs were assembled to roughly 48,000 contigs and 73,000 singletons, of which approximately 25% have a high confidence match to UniProt. Approximately 6,000 new porcine gene clusters were identified. Expression analysis based on the non-normalized libraries resulted in the following findings. The distribution of cluster sizes is scaling invariant. Brain and testes are among the tissues with the greatest number of different expressed genes, whereas tissues with more specialized function, such as developing liver, have fewer expressed genes. There are at least 65 high confidence housekeeping gene candidates and 876 cDNA library-specific gene candidates. We identified differential expression of genes between different tissues, in particular brain/spinal cord, and found patterns of correlation between genes that share expression in pairs of libraries. Finally, there was remarkable agreement in expression between specialized tissues according to Gene Ontology categories.

conclusionThis EST collection, the largest to date in pig, represents an essential resource for annotation, comparative genomics, assembly of the pig genome sequence, and further porcine transcription studies.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsAnimalsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryGenomicsMultigene FamilyRNA, MessengerSwineRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID17407547
PMCPMC1895994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.