Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17407382›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2007

Survey sequencing and comparative analysis of the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) genome.

Byrappa Venkatesh, Ewen F Kirkness, Yong-Hwee Loh, Aaron L Halpern, Alison P Lee, Justin Johnson, Nidhi Dandona, Lakshmi D Viswanathan, Alice Tay, J Craig Venter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Silver chimaera genome highlights lineage-specific sex chromosome and opsin gene evolution in holocephalans.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Three amphioxus reference genomes reveal gene and chromosome evolution of chordates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Byrappa VenkateshInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore. mcbbv@imcb.a-star.edu.sg
Ewen F Kirkness
Yong-Hwee Loh
Aaron L Halpern
Alison P Lee
Justin Johnson
Nidhi Dandona
Lakshmi D Viswanathan
Alice Tay
J Craig Venter
Robert L Strausberg
Sydney Brenner
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · SGJ. Craig Venter Institute · USCenter for Genomic Science · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to their phylogenetic position, cartilaginous fishes (sharks, rays, skates, and chimaeras) provide a critical reference for our understanding of vertebrate genome evolution. The relatively small genome of the elephant shark, Callorhinchus milii, a chimaera, makes it an attractive model cartilaginous fish genome for whole-genome sequencing and comparative analysis. Here, the authors describe survey sequencing (1.4x coverage) and comparative analysis of the elephant shark genome, one of the first cartilaginous fish genomes to be sequenced to this depth. Repetitive sequences, represented mainly by a novel family of short interspersed element-like and long interspersed element-like sequences, account for about 28% of the elephant shark genome. Fragments of approximately 15,000 elephant shark genes reveal specific examples of genes that have been lost differentially during the evolution of tetrapod and teleost fish lineages. Interestingly, the degree of conserved synteny and conserved sequences between the human and elephant shark genomes are higher than that between human and teleost fish genomes. Elephant shark contains putative four Hox clusters indicating that, unlike teleost fish genomes, the elephant shark genome has not experienced an additional whole-genome duplication. These findings underscore the importance of the elephant shark as a critical reference vertebrate genome for comparative analysis of the human and other vertebrate genomes. This study also demonstrates that a survey-sequencing approach can be applied productively for comparative analysis of distantly related vertebrate genomes.

Indexed as

GenomeAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceDNAHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSharksDNA

Identifiers

PMID17407382
PMCPMC1845163
OpenAlexW2074765204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.