Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17406776›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2007

Efficacy and safety of 1,000 mg effervescent aspirin: individual patient data meta-analysis of three trials in migraine headache and migraine accompanying symptoms.

Christian Lampl, M Voelker, H C Diener

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Migraine Treatment: Current Acute Medications and Their Potential Mechanisms of Action.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  6. Evidence-Based Treatments for Adults with Migraine.Pain research and treatment · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Survey of migraine sufferers with dogs to evaluate for canine migraine-alerting behaviors.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2013
    Article
  9. Efficacy and gastrointestinal risk of aspirin used for the treatment of pain and cold.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
  10. Suggested randomised, controlled trial with frovatriptan.The journal of headache and pain · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian LamplDept. of Neurology, Pain and Headache Center, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, A-4010 Linz, Austria.
M Voelker
H C Diener
Bayer (Germany) · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is often associated with health consequences including impaired quality of life, and the cost of treating migraine headaches places a significant financial burden on patients who suffer from migraines. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans are commonly used for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Aspirin is widely accepted as a treatment option for migraine pain relief and could provide an alternative not only for treatment of moderate migraine attacks, but also for severe migraine attacks. The efficacy and safety of 1,000 mg effervescent aspirin (eASA) was evaluated in comparison to 50 mg sumatriptan and placebo in an individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized, placebo-controlled, single- dose migraine trials. Pain-relief at 2 h, pain-free at 2 h and sustained pain-free up to 24 h were calculated. For eASA, the response rates were 51.5 % (95 % CI: 46.6-56.5 %), 27.1 % (95 % CI: 22.6-31.4 %), and 23.5 % (95 % CI: 19.3-27.7 %). For sumatriptan, the response rates were 46.6 % (95% CI: 40.0-53.2 %), 29% (95 % CI: 23.0-34.9 %), and 22.2 % (95 % CI: 16.7-27.6 %). The corresponding rates for placebo were 33.9 % (95% CI: 29.1-38.6 %), 15.1 % (95 % CI: 11.5-18.7 %), and 14.6 % (95 % CI: 11.0-18.1 %). The treatment effect of eASA and sumatriptan were significantly different from placebo (p < 0.001), but differences between eASA and sumatriptan were not significant. The remission of accompanying symptoms and the subgroup analyses of patients with moderate or severe migraine pain at baseline revealed no significant differences between eASA and sumatriptan. Safety was evaluated based on the frequency of reported adverse events, and treatment with eASA was associated with lower incidence of adverse events than was with sumatriptan. This individual patient data meta-analysis provided evidence that eASA 1,000 mg is as effective as sumatriptan 50mg for the treatment of acute migraine attacks and has a better side effect profile. This is also true for patients with moderate as well as severe headache at baseline. Patients therefore should be advised to use eASA first for migraine attacks and use a triptan in case of no response.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersNauseaPain MeasurementPlacebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSerotonin Receptor AgonistsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSumatriptan

Identifiers

PMID17406776
OpenAlexW2000514235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.