Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17406492›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2006

High-throughput knockout screen in fission yeast.

Juraj Gregan, Peter K Rabitsch, Cornelia Rumpf, Maria Novatchkova, Alexander Schleiffer, Kim Nasmyth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dysfunction of Gpl1-Gih35-Wdr83 Complex inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juraj GreganResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria. juraj.gregan@univie.ac.at
Peter K Rabitsch
Cornelia Rumpf
Maria Novatchkova
Alexander Schleiffer
Kim Nasmyth
Research Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 18955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have designed the most efficient strategy to knock out genes in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe on a large scale. Our technique is based on knockout constructs that contain regions homologous to the target gene cloned into vectors carrying dominant drug-resistance markers. Most of the steps are carried out in a 96-well format, allowing simultaneous deletion of 96 genes in one batch. Based on our knockout technique, we designed a strategy for cloning knockout constructs for all predicted fission yeast genes, which is available in a form of a searchable database http://mendel.imp.ac.at/Pombe_deletion/. We validated this technique in a screen where we identified novel genes required for chromosome segregation during meiosis. Here, we present our protocol with detailed instructions. Using this protocol, one person can knock out 96 S. pombe genes in 8 days.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalEscherichia coliGenetic EngineeringGenetic MarkersGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesPlasmidsSaccharomycesSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID17406492
PMCPMC2957175
OpenAlexW2084788660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.