Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17404900›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2007

Measuring social difficulties in routine patient-centred assessment: a Rasch analysis of the social difficulties inventory.

Adam B Smith, Penny Wright, Peter Selby, Galina Velikova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Assessing the social impact of cancer: a review of available tools.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  5. Measurement invariance of the 16-item social distress scale.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Article
  6. Translation of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21) into three South Asian languages and preliminary evaluation of SDI-21(Urdu).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam B SmithPsychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group, Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre in Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. A.B.Smith@leeds.ac.uk
Penny Wright
Peter Selby
Galina Velikova

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial difficulties may add to the psychological burden experienced by cancer patients. Therefore identifying social difficulties in routine oncology practice may help prevent or alleviate distress. The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI) is a short questionnaire developed for assessing social difficulties in cancer patients. Although well-validated, not enough is known about the clinical meaning and utility of the instrument or whether the items can be meaningfully summed to form a summary index of "Social Distress". PURPOSE: To determine, using Rasch analysis, whether the SDI could be used as a summary index of social distress specifically examining three fundamental criteria: item fit, unidimensionality and item invariance.

methodsThe Partial Credit Model was applied to a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients (n = 609) who had completed the SDI.

resultsFive items were identified as misfitting (infit mean square > or = 1.3 and standardised t-statistic > or = 2) and excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining items formed a unidimensional interval scale with no additional factors identified in a principal components analysis of the residuals. No differential item functioning was observed for age, gender, diagnosis, extent of disease or social deprivation. The 16-item SDI can be summed to produce an overall index of social distress, facilitating routine identification of social difficulties. Subsequent work is needed to evaluate whether the instrument is able to identify patients with high levels of social distress requiring intervention.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPatient-Centered CareQuality of LifeSickness Impact ProfileAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNeoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.