Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17404750›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2007

Replication origin plasticity, Taylor-made: inhibition vs recruitment of origins under conditions of replication stress.

David M Gilbert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. LSD1 is required for euchromatic origin firing and replication timing.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Article
  4. Mind the replication gap.Royal Society open science · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David M GilbertDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA. gilbert@bio.fsu.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among his many contributions to the field of chromosome structure and dynamics, J. Herbert Taylor showed that eukaryotic cells have many more potential replication origins than they use, which they can recruit when replication forks are slowed to complete S-phase in a timely fashion. Thirty years later, his findings raise an important but largely overlooked paradox. Although new data have confirmed his results, a larger body of data has revealed that slowing replication forks activates an S-phase checkpoint cascade that inhibits initiation from unfired origins until the stress is relieved. In this paper, in celebration of Taylor's work published in Chromosoma 30 years ago, I draw attention to this paradox and offer some plausible models to explain how replication stress can both inhibit and recruit new origins. I hope that this essay will stimulate further experimentation into the basis of Taylor's original findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleDNA ReplicationModels, GeneticReplication OriginRepliconS Phase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.