ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007
Histamine H3-receptor agonists and imidazole-based H3-receptor antagonists can be thermodynamically discriminated.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Time, Temperature, and Conformational Changes on the Characterization of Cardiotonic Steroid-NaThe Journal of membrane biology · 2026Review
- Simplified Method for Kinetic and Thermodynamic Screening of Cardiotonic Steroids through the KMolecular pharmacology · 2024Article
- Computed Protein-Protein Enthalpy Signatures as a Tool for Identifying Conformation Sampling Problems.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Histamine H3-receptor agonists and imidazole-based H3-receptor antagonists can be thermodynamically discriminated.British journal of pharmacology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeStudies suggest that measurement of thermodynamic parameters can allow discrimination of agonists and antagonists. Here we investigate whether agonists and antagonists can be thermodynamically discriminated at histamine H(3) receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The pK(L) of the antagonist radioligand, [(3)H]-clobenpropit, in guinea-pig cortex membranes was estimated at 4, 12, 21 and 30 degrees C in 20 mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (buffer A), or buffer A containing 300 mM CaCl(2), (buffer A(Ca)). pK(I)' values for ligands with varying intrinsic activity were determined in buffer A and A(Ca) at 4, 12, 21 and 30 degrees C. KEY
resultsIn buffer A, the pK(L) of [(3)H]-clobenpropit increased with decreasing temperature while it did not change in buffer A(Ca). The Bmax was not affected by temperature or buffer and n (H) values were not different from unity. In buffer A, pK(I)' values for agonists remained unchanged or decreased with decreasing temperature, while antagonist pK(I) values increased with decreasing temperature; agonist binding was entropy-driven while antagonist binding was enthalpy and entropy-driven. In buffer A(Ca), temperature had no effect on antagonist and agonist pK(I) values; both agonist and antagonist binding were enthalpy and entropy-driven. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The binding of H(3)-receptor agonists and antagonists can be thermodynamically discriminated under conditions where agonist pK(I)' values are over-estimated (pK(I)' not = pK(app)). However, under conditions when agonist pK(I) approximately pK(app), the thermodynamics underlying the binding of agonists are not different to those of antagonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.