Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17401430›Full record

ReviewOncogene2007

Mutant p53: an oncogenic transcription factor.

S Strano, S Dell'Orso, S Di Agostino, G Fontemaggi, A Sacchi, G Blandino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic Strategies to Activate p53.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predicting Response to Anthracyclines in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S StranoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via delle Messi d'oro, Rome, Italy.
S Dell'Orso
S Di Agostino
G Fontemaggi
A Sacchi
G Blandino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes is one of the key hallmarks of a tumor. Unlike other tumor-suppressor genes, p53 is inactivated by missense mutations in half of all human cancers. It has become increasingly clear that the resulting mutant p53 proteins do not represent only the mere loss of wild-type p53 tumor suppressor activity, but gain new oncogenic properties favoring the insurgence, the maintenance, the spreading and the chemoresistance of malignant tumors. The actual challenge is the fine deciphering of the molecular mechanisms underlying the gain of function of mutant p53 proteins. In this review, we will focus mainly on the transcriptional activity of mutant p53 proteins as one of the potential molecular mechanisms. To date, the related knowledge is still quite scarce and many of the raised questions of this review are yet unanswered.

Indexed as

OncogenesHumansMutationNeoplasmsTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Transcription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID17401430
OpenAlexW2017449972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.