ArticleBiophysical journal2007
Intrinsic fluctuations, robustness, and tunability in signaling cycles.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design principles of ciliary signaling.Journal of cell science · 2025Review
- Compartmental exchange regulates steady states and stochastic switching of a phosphorylation network.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Frequency-preference response in covalent modification cycles under substrate sequestration conditions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Molecular switch architecture determines response properties of signaling pathways.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Article
- On the emergence of cognition: from catalytic closure to neuroglial closure.Journal of biological physics · 2020Article
- Article
- Intrinsic limits of information transmission in biochemical signalling motifs.Interface focus · 2018Article
- The Significance of the Bifunctional Kinase/Phosphatase Activities of Diphosphoinositol Pentakisphosphate Kinases (PPIP5Ks) for Coupling Inositol Pyrophosphate Cell Signaling to Cellular Phosphate Homeostasis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Noise and information transmission in promoters with multiple internal States.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- The contribution of Notch1 to nephron segmentation in the developing kidney is revealed in a sensitized Notch2 background and can be augmented by reducing Mint dosage.Developmental biology · 2010Article
- Stochastic bimodalities in deterministically monostable reversible chemical networks due to network topology reduction.The Journal of chemical physics · 2009Article
- The effects of reversibility and noise on stochastic phosphorylation cycles and cascades.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
- The Goldbeter-Koshland switch in the first-order region and its response to dynamic disorder.PloS one · 2008Article
- Operating regimes of signaling cycles: statics, dynamics, and noise filtering.PLoS computational biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covalent modification cycles (e.g., phosphorylation-dephosphorylation) underlie most cellular signaling and control processes. Low molecular copy number, arising from compartmental segregation and slow diffusion between compartments, potentially renders these cycles vulnerable to intrinsic chemical fluctuations. How can a cell operate reliably in the presence of this inherent stochasticity? How do changes in extrinsic parameters lead to variability of response? Can cells exploit these parameters to tune cycles to different ranges of stimuli? We study the dynamics of an isolated phosphorylation cycle. Our model shows that the cycle transmits information reliably if it is tuned to an optimal parameter range, despite intrinsic fluctuations and even for small input signal amplitudes. At the same time, the cycle is sensitive to changes in the concentration and activity of kinases and phosphatases. This sensitivity can lead to significant cell-to-cell response variability. It also provides a mechanism to tune the cycle to transmit signals in various amplitude ranges. Our results show that signaling cycles possess a surprising combination of robustness and tunability. This combination makes them ubiquitous in eukaryotic signaling, optimizing signaling in the presence of fluctuations using their inherent flexibility. On the other hand, cycles tuned to suppress intrinsic fluctuations can be vulnerable to changes in the number and activity of kinases and phosphatases. Such trade-offs in robustness to intrinsic and extrinsic fluctuations can influence the evolution of signaling cascades, making them the weakest links in cellular circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.