ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2007
Comparative genomic hybridization arrays in clinical pathology: progress and challenges.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Array comparative genomic hybridisation in haematological malignancies: A comprehensive review.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Amplification of thymosin beta 10 and AKAP13 genes in metastatic and aggressive papillary thyroid carcinomas.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2012Article
- Identification of a deep intronic mutation in the COL6A2 gene by a novel custom oligonucleotide CGH array designed to explore allelic and genetic heterogeneity in collagen VI-related myopathies.BMC medical genetics · 2010Article
- Anaplastic thyroid cancer: molecular pathogenesis and emerging therapies.Endocrine-related cancer · 2009Review
- Microarray-based mutation detection in the dystrophin gene.Human mutation · 2008Article
- Canine cytogenetics--from band to basepair.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2008Review
- Clinical application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the identification of prognostically important genetic alterations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) genome scanning is a powerful method for the global detection of gains and losses of genetic material in both congenital and neoplastic disorders. When used as a clinical diagnostic test, array CGH combines the whole genome perspective of traditional G-banded cytogenetics with the targeted identification of cryptic chromosomal abnormalities characteristic of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, the presence of structural variants in the human genome can complicate analysis of patient samples, and array CGH does not provide morphologic information about chromosome structure, balanced translocations, or the actual chromosomal location of segmental duplications. Identification of such anomalies has significant diagnostic and prognostic implications for the patient. We therefore propose that array CGH should be used as a guide to the presence of genomic structural rearrangements in germline and tumor genomes that can then be further characterized by FISH or G-banding, depending on the clinical scenario. In this article, we share some of our experiences with diagnostic array CGH and discuss recent progress and challenges involved with the integration of array CGH into clinical laboratory medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.