Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17395842›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2007

Changes in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality rates among French men between 1968 and 1996.

Gwenn Menvielle, Annette Leclerc, Jean-François Chastang, Maria Melchior, Danièle Luce, Evolution Des Inégalités Sociales Par Causes Médicales de Décès (Trend in Social Inequalities by Cause of Death) group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gwenn MenvielleNational Institute of Health and Medical Research, Saint-Maurice, France. gwenn.menvielle@st-maurice.inserm.fr
Annette Leclerc
Jean-François Chastang
Maria Melchior
Danièle Luce
Evolution Des Inégalités Sociales Par Causes Médicales de Décès (Trend in Social Inequalities by Cause of Death) group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe investigated changes in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality rates among men in France between 1968 and 1996.

methodsWe used a representative sample of 1% of the French population and studied 4 periods (1968-1974, 1975-1981, 1982-1988, and 1990-1996). Causes of death were obtained by direct linkage with the French national death registry. The socioeconomic position of men aged 35 to 59 years was measured by using the occupational class reported at the time of the census at the beginning of each period. Analyses were conducted for all cancers and specifically for lung, upper aerodigestive tract, esophageal, colorectal, and other cancers.

resultsIn all analyses, we observed socioeconomic inequalities during the 4 periods considered; the inequalities increased between the first and the last period. Most of the total increase occurred between 1968 and 1981, and inequalities remained stable thereafter. Inequalities were larger when men out of the labor force were included in the analysis. The strongest increase in socioeconomic inequalities over time was observed for upper aerodigestive tract cancer.

conclusionsAlthough cancer mortality rates have decreased, substantial socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality among men remain.

Indexed as

PovertySocial ClassAdultAgedCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEsophageal NeoplasmsFranceHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityNeoplasmsOccupationsRegistries

Identifiers

PMID17395842
PMCPMC2040363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.