Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17394735›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007

Targeted screening for peripheral arterial disease in general practice: a pilot study in a high risk group.

Neil C Campbell, Caroline McNiff, Jane Sheran, Julie Brittenden, Amanda J Lee, Lewis D Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inter-arm blood pressure difference and mortality: a cohort study in an asymptomatic primary care population at elevated cardiovascular risk.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Primary care screening for peripheral arterial disease: a cross-sectional observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Screening for peripheral vascular disease.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil C CampbellUniversity of Aberdeen, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Foresterhill Health Centre, Aberdeen. n.campbell@abdn.ac.uk
Caroline McNiff
Jane Sheran
Julie Brittenden
Amanda J Lee
Lewis D Ritchie
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening of high-risk groups for peripheral arterial disease has been advocated because the condition underdiagnosed and secondary prevention can reduce cardiovascular event rates.

aimTo establish the feasibility of screening for peripheral arterial disease in people aged 60 years or over with hypertension, and to estimate the potential to improve secondary preventive treatment. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pilot study and cross-sectional survey.

settingLarge general practice in north-east Scotland.

methodPeople aged 60 years or over with hypertension but no cardiovascular disease or diabetes were identified from computer records and invited to a screening clinic. Data were collected on ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI), preventive treatment, and risk factors.

resultsOf 705 potentially eligible patients, 443 (63%) agreed to participate. Sixty-four were excluded and 364 of 379 patients (96%) attended screening. Thirty patients had peripheral arterial disease (ABPI of 0.9 or less), of whom 24 (7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4 to 10%) were previously undiagnosed. Fifteen (50%) patients took antiplatelets, 13 (45%) had cholesterol <5 mmol/l, and 16 (53%) had blood pressure below 140/85 mmHg. Twenty-two (73%) patients were non-smokers, 14 (47%) had low-fat diets, two (7%) were physically active, and three (10%) ate recommended amounts of fruit and vegetables.

conclusionsIt is feasible to screen for peripheral arterial disease in primary care, but its prevalence is lower than anticipated. There is room for improvement in secondary preventive treatment and lifestyle, so a structured programme could still have important benefits for survival.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesDietFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPeripheral Vascular DiseasesPilot ProjectsPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17394735
PMCPMC2043337
OpenAlexW1862831850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.