ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007
Fast automated cell phenotype image classification.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced computer-aided diagnosis for age-related macular degeneration: integrating segmentation and feature extraction for precise diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MobileDANet integrating transfer learning and dynamic attention for classifying multi target histopathology images with explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of pulse wave velocity through weighted visibility graph metrics from photoplethysmographic signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiscale chromatin dynamics and high entropy in plant iPSC ancestors.Journal of cell science · 2024Article
- ImAge quantitates aging and rejuvenation.Nature aging · 2024Article
- Advanced disk herniation computer aided diagnosis system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optical coherence tomography for multicellular tumor spheroid category recognition and drug screening classification via multi-spatial-superficial-parameter and machine learning.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Imaging-based chromatin and epigenetic age, ImAge, quantitates aging and rejuvenation.Research square · 2023Article
- Breast Tumor Tissue Image Classification Using DIU-Net.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Different Convolutional Neural Network Activation Functions and Methods for Building Ensembles for Small to Midsize Medical Data Sets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Scaling multi-instance support vector machine to breast cancer detection on the BreaKHis dataset.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Identification of phenotype-specific networks from paired gene expression-cell shape imaging data.Genome research · 2022Article
- Article
- Deep Features for Training Support Vector Machines.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- In Situ Classification of Cell Types in Human Kidney Tissue Using 3D Nuclear Staining.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021Article
- Image Descriptors for Weakly Annotated Histopathological Breast Cancer Data.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Article
- Histopathological Classification of Breast Cancer Images Using a Multi-Scale Input and Multi-Feature Network.Cancers · 2020Article
- Image-Based Analysis of Protein Stability.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020Article
- Stochastic Selection of Activation Layers for Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A reference library for assigning protein subcellular localizations by image-based machine learning.The Journal of cell biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe genomic revolution has led to rapid growth in sequencing of genes and proteins, and attention is now turning to the function of the encoded proteins. In this respect, microscope imaging of a protein's sub-cellular localisation is proving invaluable, and recent advances in automated fluorescent microscopy allow protein localisations to be imaged in high throughput. Hence there is a need for large scale automated computational techniques to efficiently quantify, distinguish and classify sub-cellular images. While image statistics have proved highly successful in distinguishing localisation, commonly used measures suffer from being relatively slow to compute, and often require cells to be individually selected from experimental images, thus limiting both throughput and the range of potential applications. Here we introduce threshold adjacency statistics, the essence which is to threshold the image and to count the number of above threshold pixels with a given number of above threshold pixels adjacent. These novel measures are shown to distinguish and classify images of distinct sub-cellular localization with high speed and accuracy without image cropping.
resultsThreshold adjacency statistics are applied to classification of protein sub-cellular localization images. They are tested on two image sets (available for download), one for which fluorescently tagged proteins are endogenously expressed in 10 sub-cellular locations, and another for which proteins are transfected into 11 locations. For each image set, a support vector machine was trained and tested. Classification accuracies of 94.4% and 86.6% are obtained on the endogenous and transfected sets, respectively. Threshold adjacency statistics are found to provide comparable or higher accuracy than other commonly used statistics while being an order of magnitude faster to calculate. Further, threshold adjacency statistics in combination with Haralick measures give accuracies of 98.2% and 93.2% on the endogenous and transfected sets, respectively.
conclusionThreshold adjacency statistics have the potential to greatly extend the scale and range of applications of image statistics in computational image analysis. They remove the need for cropping of individual cells from images, and are an order of magnitude faster to calculate than other commonly used statistics while providing comparable or better classification accuracy, both essential requirements for application to large-scale approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.