Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17394627›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2007

Less pain with Biatain-Ibu: initial findings from a randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical investigation on painful venous leg ulcers.

Finn Gottrup, Bo Jørgensen, Tonny Karlsmark, R Gary Sibbald, Rytis Rimdeika, Keith Harding, Patricia Price, Vanessa Venning, Peter Vowden, Michael Jünger and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Topical agents or dressings for pain in venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Venous leg ulcers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Venous leg ulcers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Finn GottrupUniversity Centre for Wound Healing, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. fgottrup@post4.tele.dk
Bo Jørgensen
Tonny Karlsmark
R Gary Sibbald
Rytis Rimdeika
Keith Harding
Patricia Price
Vanessa Venning
Peter Vowden
Michael Jünger
Stephan Wortmann
Rita Sulcaite
Gintaris Vilkevicius
Terttu-Liisa Ahokas
Karel Ettler
Monika Arenbergerova
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKCardiff University · GBBradford Royal Infirmary · GBCharles University · CZChurchill Hospital · GBKainuun keskussairaala · FILandeszentrum Gesundheit Nordrhein-Westfalen · DEOdense University Hospital · DKUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversity of Toronto · CAVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Six out of 10 patients with chronic wounds suffer from persistent wound pain. A multinational and multicentre, randomised, double-blind clinical investigation of 122 patients compared two moist wound-healing dressings, a non adhesive foam dressing with ibuprofen (62 patients randomised to Biatain-Ibu non adhesive, Coloplast A/S) with a non adhesive foam without ibuprofen (60 to Biatain non adhesive). The ibuprofen-foam was regarded successful, if the pain relief on a 5-point verbal rating scale was higher than the comparator without compromising safety, including appropriate healing rate. Additional endpoints were change in persistent wound pain between dressing changes and pain at dressing change on days 1-5 and days 43-47. The primary response variable, persistent pain relief, was significantly higher in the ibuprofen-foam group compared with the comparator on days 1-5, with a quick onset of action (P < 0.05). The patients in the ibuprofen-foam group had a significant (P < 0.05) higher reduction in the persistent wound pain from baseline (40%) as the comparator (30%). Women reported less pain intensity than men, and pain intensity decreased with increasing age. In addition, pain intensity increased with increasing initial pain intensity and increasing wound size. Wound healing was similar in the ibuprofen-foam group to that of the comparator group. No difference in adverse events between placebo and local sustained release of low-dose ibuprofen was observed in this study. This study has demonstrated that the ibuprofen-foam dressing provided pain relief and reduced pain intensity without compromising healing or other safety parameters. The full report of this study will be published in Wound Repair and Regeneration.

Indexed as

BandagesPain ManagementAdministration, TopicalAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIbuprofenMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeVaricose UlcerAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticIbuprofen

Identifiers

PMID17394627
PMCPMC7951302
OpenAlexW1967156170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.