Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17393305›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2007

The use of transcriptomic biomarkers for personalized medicine.

Bettina Heidecker, Joshua M Hare

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi Omics Applications in Biological Systems.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Mesenchymal STRO-1/STRO-3Future cardiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bettina HeideckerDivison of Cardiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Clinical Research Building, 1120 NW 14th Street, Suite 1112, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Joshua M Hare

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarrays are a high throughput technology that allows the quantification of tens of thousands of RNA transcripts in a single reaction. This new technology offers the promise of comprehensive study of disease at a genomic level, potentially identifying novel molecular abnormalities, developing novel clinical biomarkers, and investigating drug efficacy. The ability to develop a molecular profile corresponding to a therapeutic effect is the basis for the concept of drug repositioning. With regard to prediction of clinical events, microarray technology has the potential to contribute to the development of sophisticated new biomarkers useful as predictors of disease etiology, outcome, and responsiveness to therapy-so-called personalized medicine. Currently progress in the field is hampered by a degree of skepticism about the reliability of microarray data and its relevance for clinical applications. Here we discuss possible pitfalls of transcriptomic analysis, review current developments in the cardiovascular area and address the use of transcriptomics for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisGenetic MarkersHeart DiseasesHumansRNA PrecursorsGenetic MarkersRNA Precursors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.